From the 'Punctuation Matters' file comes this news from across the Tasman...
"Missing Apostrophe in Facebook Post Lands a Man in Defamation Court"
At issue is the word “employees” in the post, which read: “Oh Stuart Gan!! Selling multi million $ homes in Pearl Beach but can’t pay his employees superannuation,” referring to Australia’s retirement system, in which money is paid by employers into super accounts for employees. “Shame on you Stuart!!! 2 yrs and still waiting!!!”...
On Thursday, a judge in New South Wales ruled that the lack of an apostrophe on the word “employees” could be read to suggest a “systematic pattern of conduct” by Mr. Gan’s agency rather than an accusation involving one employee. So she allowed the case to proceed...
In matters of punctuation, social media is the Wild West. In some corners of the internet, careless grammar is highly tolerated — even a badge of honour. In legal matters, however, disputed punctuation can cost millions.
[Shamelessly stolen from Paul Hsieh's Geek Press blog, which always has interesting tech news and great snippets like this]
1 comment:
But in that case, shouldn't the apostrophe follow the apostrophe follow the 's'? The way it is written, it doesn't mean anything.
Post a Comment