"It's time for Ayn Rand's Power Question: What facts of reality give rise to the need for such a concept as X?
"Here, X is 'citizenship.' Why do we need this concept? Mainly, to determine who can vote. You can probably think of a few perquisites that attend to attaining the status of 'citizen.' But that status has nothing to do with the rights of man.
"The territory within the boundaries of a given country is the area in which its law has jurisdiction, the area in which a specific government, by its apparatus of compulsion, maintains a de jure and de facto monopoly on the use of physical force.
"We used to discuss whether the police, in a voluntarily financed laissez-faire nation, would protect the rights of non-contributors against criminals. The answer was: yes, mainly because the thug who would assault anyone is a threat to everyone, including the contributors. The 'yes' answer follows from practical, moral, and symbolic considerations. Defending the rights and freedom of everyone currently in the country is symbolic of a government devoted to justice.
"The same considerations that require the government protect the rights of non-contributors apply to protecting the rights of non-citizens. ...
"But due process and all the safeguards are there to rein in and make safer everybody who faces the possibility of government interference. The safeguards are there to eliminate arbitrary power.
"Government is potentially a far bigger threat than criminals.
"To introduce a preserve within which government agents can exercise unsupervised power is a threat that dwarfs that of any gang of hoodlums (citizens or non-citizens).
"And this is what we are seeing with Trump's every action—the quest for arbitrary power, unconstrained by checks and balances or anything other than the will of Donald Trump.
"If Trump doesn't have to follow due process in regard to non-citizens, does he have to follow it in regard to determining whether or not the person is a citizen? That's not theoretical. That's today's headlines.
"It can't be repeated too often: the solution to crime is not "screening" or "roundups" of anyone; it's repeal of the drug laws.
"It can't be repeated too often: the solution to lawless behavior by immigrants is not lawless behavior by the police.
"You can avoid a criminal gang; you can even move to a different locale. You can't avoid a SWAT team, the FBI, or any part of the state's apparatus of compulsion and incarceration."~ Harry Binswanger from his post 'A sense of proportion'
Monday, 19 May 2025
Q: Why do we need the concept of 'citizenship'?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
It would be better to see a positive article from Binnie rather than his fixation on supposed negatives. And I don't need Binnie to tell me Trump does make some errors. How about some positives? Try Andrew Bernstein. I agree here: https://capitalismmagazine.com/2025/05/trump-is-vastly-superior-to-the-left/
"Fixation"?
No: focus.
"...supposed negatives?"
No: actual threats from potentially unconstrained govt power.
"Trump does make some errors. How about some positives."
It's not a supermarket checkout here. What we are seeing with Trump's every action is the quest for arbitrary power, unconstrained by checks and balances or anything other than the will of Donald Trump.
That Bernstein is disappointingly blind to that doesn't mean that we need to be.
@ gregster - Even if we make the assumption that there are other things that Trump is doing right, that's not the purpose of this piece. It's to highlight one specific thing he's doing very wrong, and which is very dangerous. This the problem I see time and time with Trump supporters. You observe that he does a few things right, so you ignore or give him a free pass to do other things that are really bad. It convinces me that the majority of his support comes from an emotional rather than rational perspective.
Post a Comment