Tuesday, 13 December 2022

What (and Whom) to Believe?


"There are three ways of arriving at an opinion on any subject. The first is to believe what one is told; the second is to disbelieve it; and the third is to examine the matter for oneself. The overwhelming majority of mankind practise the first method; of the remainder, the overwhelming majority practise the second; only an infinitesimal remnant practise the third.
    "To believe what one is told is the right method for most people in regard to most questions. I believe there is a place called Vladivostok because the atlas says so and because I have met apparently veracious people who assert that they have been there. But if I were engaged in making a survey of eastern Siberia for the Soviet Government, I should have to verify the existence of Vladivostok for myself. Believing what one is told is proper whenever there is a consensus except in matters on which one is a professional expert. In many of the most important questions there is a local but not a world-wide consensus.
    "To disbelieve what one is told is the method of the rebel and as a general practice has nothing to recommend it. Wisdom is not achieved by refusing to believe that 2 and 2 make 4, or that there is such a place as Vladivostok. When the authorities are unanimous, they are usually right; when they are not, the plain man does well to suspend judgement. A general habit of intellectual rebellion is more foolish than a general habit of intellectual acquiescence, and if it became common it would make civilisation impossible.
    "It is wise, however, to feel some degree of doubt, greater or less according to circumstances, as regards even universally accepted opinion. Few things seemed more firmly established than the Newtonian theory of gravitation, yet it turned out to need correction. The rational man, in such cases, acts upon the accepted opinion but is willing to give a hearing to anyone who advances serious reasons against it.
    "Rationality is shown not so much in what you believe as in how you believe it. You are rational if you believe it on evidence and as firmly as the evidence warrants and if, further, your belief leads you to act only in ways which are no obstacle to the discovery of error.
    "Freedom of opinion is important, since, without it, no generally received error can ever be corrected; therefore no belief should be so firmly held as to lead to persecution of those who reject it. But so long as freedom of opinion is safeguarded, all except professional experts have a better chance of being right if they accept than if they reject the prevalent opinion.”

— Bertrand Russell, from his 1931 essay 'What to Believe', collected in the book Mortals and Others

1 comment:

MarkT said...

Quite a good insight from Bertrand Russell.

I would add that the third, examining for oneself, does not necessarily require specific knowledge in the area. You can arrive at reasonable certainty, albeit with a chance of error by integrating a proposition with the rest of one's knowledge. Testing it against what you do know to see if it all adds up - and considering what else you would likely exist if it were true. Does it pass the sniff test?

For instance, take the proposition that man has been to the moon, or that covid vaccines minimise the chances of ill-health - both things I believe to be true. Governments are responsible for/promote both propositions. Do I believe it because I trust all governments? No, there's a lot of things I don't trust governments on. Because of that lack of trust, do I believe it to be untrue? No. Is that because I have specialist knowledge in space travel and infectious diseases, or have studied either deeply. Not that either. Why then do I believe both?

For the moon landings to be fake, there would need to be massive and widespread conspiracy across thousands of individuals, both government and private, with none of them blowing the whistle over a long period of time, and there being no proof of the conspiracy coming to light, including from a Soviet Union who had their own space program and were competing with the Americans. Completely implausible, and counter to numerous things I do know about the world from first-hand experience. Therefore I believe it is true - men have been to the moon.

A similar conspiracy would be required, and for all the experts in this field to be shills of some nationwide and integrated conspiracy, for covid vaccines to be more dangerous than covid. Equally implausible. Therefore I believe what the overwhelming number of experts recommend, without having any detailed knowledge in this area.

'Examining for oneself' does not consist of cherry picking theories or studies that support your distrust of government (or any other belief), whilst ignoring the rest. Nor does it necessarily required detailed knowledge in the area.