Here's your question to consider this morning:
If Labour were to take office, they plan to spend $15.6 billion more than they take in; meanwhile National plan to continue spending more than $13 billion more than they take in.
So should either of them be consided fiscally responsible?
3 comments:
one plans to enslave 4million grandchildren in debt, the other 4.1million
both of them are drunken sailors high on P, with the ho-shop beckoning
I must point out that the $15.6 billion Labour plans to spend is marked for their new policies. There is no indication that they will stop any of National's current spending. I surmise that much of National's $13 billion overspend will be tacked on to the $15,6 billion in New policies.
Rather like the "choice" between being raped or gang-banged...
that's shocking
So does anyone know what the Greens have in store?
Post a Comment