The global warming models are falling into disrepute, global temperatures still flatly refuse to climb, and now the "science is settled" argument is about to look even more unsettled:
The National Press Club in Washington will today release the names of as many as 32,000 American Scientists who reject not only Kyoto-style greenhouse gas limits, but the very premise of manmade global warming itself. [Story: American Thinker]
So what's left of the warmist argument? Why the need to shackle our producers? And what's the collective noun for 32,000 scientists?
2 comments:
Great link PC. The momentum is shifting.
Hehe. I've signed this one twice, once under my own name and qualifications (BA Hons in Architecture) and once under an alter-ego, Buford J. McWhirter, who is an MSc in Climate Science from Eketahuna University.
I encourage anyone else interested in signing to do so here:
http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWPetition.pdf
The rigour of their fact-checking is unparalleled, believe me. This is one of the most convincing and important documents of scientific agreement ever seen. Ever. Really.
:)
DenMT
Post a Comment