Tuesday, 20 May 2008

How many thousand make a "consensus"?

The global warming models are falling into disrepute, global temperatures still flatly refuse to climb, and now the "science is settled" argument is about to look even more unsettled:

The National Press Club in Washington will today release the names of as many as 32,000 American Scientists who reject not only Kyoto-style greenhouse gas limits, but the very premise of manmade global warming itself. [Story: American Thinker]

So what's left of the warmist argument?  Why the need to shackle our producers?  And what's the collective noun for 32,000 scientists? 

A 'consensus'?



Blogger Matt B said...

Great link PC. The momentum is shifting.

20 May 2008, 12:39:00  
Anonymous DenMT said...

Hehe. I've signed this one twice, once under my own name and qualifications (BA Hons in Architecture) and once under an alter-ego, Buford J. McWhirter, who is an MSc in Climate Science from Eketahuna University.

I encourage anyone else interested in signing to do so here:


The rigour of their fact-checking is unparalleled, believe me. This is one of the most convincing and important documents of scientific agreement ever seen. Ever. Really.



21 May 2008, 11:39:00  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home