Saturday, 22 February 2025

"...the threat today’s Republican party poses to so much of what is unique and great about America."


"Vice President ... JD Vance ... [and his advisers] belong to an elite coterie of illiberal Christian conservatives animated by an attitude reminiscent of what historian Fritz Stern once called the 'politics of cultural despair' ... [harking back to] a movement of late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century intellectuals who shared a loathing of liberalism rooted in personal frustration. 'They attacked liberalism because it seemed to them the principal premise of modern society; everything they dreaded seemed to spring from it. . . . their one desire was for a new faith, a new community of believers, a world with fixed standards and no doubts.' ...

"The worldview many of Vance’s muses hold up as the alternative to liberalism is self-avowedly Roman Catholic. Catholicism offers anti-liberal intellectuals a way to anchor their dislike of the modern world in something bigger, a tradition that promises timeless truths and solutions to every social problem. Yet their Catholicism is much smaller than the tradition it rests on because of the way they have politicised it: Their use of the Catholic tradition is motivated by their animus against liberalism and therefore selective.

"One sees this in the barely disguised admiration some of them have for twentieth-century Catholic 'corporatism,' what others call clerical fascism. ...

"The high-water mark for Catholic corporatism came in the wake of the 1931 papal encyclical Quadragesimo anno. Speaking to the social question, Pope Pius XI explicitly embraced the idea of 'corporations' [a system drawing inspiration from mediaeval guilds
 in which the whole of society would be organised into distinct corporations arising from common interests]. 
"In a controversial set of paragraphs, he even appeared to approve of Italian fascism. Years later, the primary ghostwriter of Quadragesimo anno insisted the encyclical had been misread. Be that as it may, the encyclical was widely understood in its time as endorsing clerical fascism. In the words of one historian, 'Virtually every Fascist revolution of the next decade was to fly the flag of Quadragesimo anno and its corporative State.' ...
"[C]orporatist regimes were not merely experimenting with policy proposals that others might copy; they were engaged in a radical project of social transformation. The corporatist organisation they envisioned aimed to embrace every aspect of society and define life’s meaning. “In the corporation,” Messner wrote, “the individual discovers himself placed in a community whose reality he experiences, which embraces him in the day to day life of his vocation, but which also shapes the entire surroundings of his life, because it determines an area of life and cultural values of a special kind.”

"One needn’t engage in endless debates about the nature of fascism to recognise [this] as a political vision that treated individuals as parts of a societal collective, assigned the state responsibility for directing the pursuit of happiness, and had the audacity to equate its repressive regulation of people’s lives with human flourishing. That such a vision is deeply inimical to America’s Constitutional tradition should be self-evident to every honest legal scholar.

"Which brings us back to JD Vance. One cannot tell the extent to which he is an unprincipled opportunist, a true believer, or just a very online guy. What we do know, however, is that he moves among a small circle of intellectuals who toy with dangerous, deeply un-American ideas. Vance’s remark that the United States is currently in a 'late republican period' in need of a Caesar may be an indication that he’s studied De bello civili—but it’s much more likely he’s reading figures from the conservative revolution like Carl Schmitt and Oswald Spengler who talked about how Germany needed a Caesar to deliver it from parliamentary democracy. Or, likelier still, he’s reading others who have imbibed their ideas.

"That ideas like these, and the people who promote them, have influence with a man who might be placed a heartbeat from the presidency is one more piece of evidence, if more were needed, of the threat today’s Republican party poses to so much of what is unique and great about America."

~ H.David Baer from his article 'The Influence of Austrofascism on JD Vance'

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

What utter bilge rot! This is rationalisation piled upon rationalisation gently floating freely on nothingness. Did you detect the salting of psychologising and mind reading quietly stirred in there? Once upon a time this nonsense was frowned upon in Objectivism, rightly rejected by Objectivists, forbidden by none other than the mighty Ayn Rand herself and for good reason. Now, somehow, it has become acceptable.

Henry J

Rex said...

I noticed today on Substack https://open.substack.com/pub/heyslick/p/the-coup-is-already-over-you-just-havent-admitted-it-yet?r=20k7ox&utm_medium=ios
Centre left folk are saying the destruction of the constitution is because people shrugged. As a fan of Rand for decades I feel quite emotional about it. Many of these folk would have never heard of her.

Also many so called Objectivists were always garden variety conservatives, now they seem to be conspiracists and anti vaccination fools.Not our host of course.

MarkT said...

Yes, it’s looking increasingly like we’re heading into a replay of the 1930’s. For decades the Left have taken us in an undesirable direction, just as they had back then. The Right don’t like them and are a scared of them, but propose to take us somewhere just as bad, if not worse. They have no answer to the corruption of the Left except a repair to religious faith and authoritarianism.

Mark Hubbard said...

Totally agree. ... this presidency is a rearguard action to save Western values, and only Trump and Vance can do it, and I never expected to see it. I had settled into living in the ruins of Western civilisation (which will still be outcome most likely for UK and Western Europe, unless AfD can get in Germany).

A Democrat win with Harris would have been an unmitigated disaster: probably the capitulation of America wholly from it's former super power status and there may well have been no way back.

Could some other Republican have been better? Irrelevant, from the Bible and Rust Belts, only Trump was going to get in. End of.

And from his first weeks, from his advisers, Elon (he is the genius of our time, and no one is more firmly welded to free speech and free lives), from DOGE, I'm still willing to give this presidency huge benefit of the doubt.

Yes, I don't like Trump on Ukraine/Russia, Putin should be toppled, BUT, Trump is by nature an isolationist, he's concerned with America and all of her problems from DEI to FED and the debt trend, to defeat Putin will take millions of human lives into the brutal meat mincer of that battle ... Getting it stopped, a cap on Putin, provided appropriately by EU spending and meeting their defence obligations at last, might not be the worst scenario (or best: but there is no good scenario).

And to counter balance Ukraine/Russia, Trump is finally a true friend of Israel, his Abraham Accords in Middle East are and will be as important, if not more so than Eastern Europe.

Finally all this nonsense about Catholicism - and Jesus I'm no friend of them vis a vis euthanasia, etc etc - the writer simply doesn't understand America: we Kiwis certainly have no comprehension at all of the people of Bible and Belt 'patriotic' - dirty word I know to the liberal - Americans... but that, also, is what made America great to begin with. And the current president is above all else, a Patriot.

We need to get over ourselves.

[What's that saying: conservatives are just liberals who had daughters).

Mark Hubbard said...

[Hopefully the typo ridden version of below I still see above but have deleted will disappear :)]

Totally agree. ... this presidency is a rearguard action to save Western values, and only Trump and Vance can do it, and I never expected to see it. I had settled into living in the ruins of Western civilisation (which will still be outcome most likely for UK and Western Europe, unless AfD can get in Germany).

A Democrat win with Harris would have been an unmitigated disaster: probably the capitulation of America wholly from it's former super power status and there may well have been no way back.

Could some other Republican have been better? Irrelevant, from the Bible and Rust Belts, only Trump was going to get in. End of.

And from his first weeks, from his advisers, Elon (he is the genius of our time, and no one is more firmly welded to free speech and free lives), from DOGE, I'm still willing to give this presidency huge benefit of the doubt.

Yes, I don't like Trump on Ukraine/Russia, Putin should be toppled, BUT, Trump is by nature an isolationist, he's concerned with America and all of her problems from DEI to FED and the debt trend, to defeat Putin will take millions of human lives into the brutal meat mincer of that battle ... Getting it stopped, a cap on Putin, provided appropriately by EU spending and meeting their defence obligations at last, might not be the worst scenario (or best: but there is no good scenario).

And to counter balance Ukraine/Russia, Trump is finally a true friend of Israel, his Abraham Accords in Middle East are and will be as important, if not more so than Eastern Europe.

Finally all this nonsense about Catholicism - and Jesus I'm no friend of them vis a vis euthanasia, etc etc - the writer simply doesn't understand America: we Kiwis certainly have no comprehension at all of the people of Bible and Belt 'patriotic' - dirty word I know to the liberal - Americans... but that, also, is what made America great to begin with. And the current president is above all else, a Patriot.

We need to get over ourselves.

[What's that saying: conservatives are just liberals who had daughters)

Mark Hubbard said...

I put wrong on up again ... This 'we Kiwis certainly have no comprehension at all of the people of Bible and Belt 'patriotic' - dirty word I know to the liberal - Americans... but that, also...'

Should read: 'we Kiwis certainly have no comprehension at all of Bible and Rust Belt 'patriotic' - dirty word I know to the liberal - Americans... but that, also