Tuesday, 12 July 2016

Do 97% of Climate Scientists Really Agree?


“Is it true that 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real? Where does the 97% figure come from? And if it is true, do they agree on both the severity of and the solution to climate change? New York Times bestselling author Alex Epstein', founder of the Center for Industrial Progress, reveals the origins of the "97%" figure and explains how to think more clearly about it and about climate change.”




  1. Here is what Epstein could have said.
    The claim that 97% of Scientists say that Global warming is man made occurrence is a lie.
    Nature is responsible for Climate, we can not tax Nature, or attribute malice or criticise and blame the sun.
    Consensus science is oxymoron. Mostly moron. Two and two make four, even if 97% of social Scientists think five.
    Consensus is a good method for people deciding matters on a social situation. As in a Committee meeting of a school board.

    The claim of 97% man made warming is a scientific fraud . This can be shown and proven.
    This 97% consensus falsity, was made by selective and misguided interpretations, deliberately false attributions, and careful dismissal of certain opposing findings.

    The author is a confirmed climate change zealot, without scientific credentials. He is a paid up propagandist for the Climate change industry

    When you hear an opinion about climate change or any claimed 'scientist', ask yourself
    Is the broadcaster of this opinion an interested party ?. Is he associated with socio political opinion on the subject.
    Is he a zealot / Does he have a financial reward . John Cook yes / ignore or hang him
    Does the broadcaster have a neutral and solid scientific background. John Cook No. He is a propaganda communicator for AGW bodies.
    Is the broadcaster with a @ progressive academic body'. John Cook yes .
    Why are they repeating this nonsense over and over again. A lie repeated continuously becomes believed.

    Two things we need to remember.
    1. The man made global warming and catastrophe myth is based on false science and the privilege of Government/ United Nations funding.
    2. The fraudulent AGW science is plentiful and can be seen by anyone prepared to examine it.

    We have a tree ready on the Mildura highway for John Cook.

    1. If he'd said all that it would be less articulate, and less convincing.

    2. So PragerU is a reputable source as long as they have the same stance as you. Right Mark?


1. Comments are welcome and encouraged.
2. Comments are moderated. Gibberish, spam & off-topic grandstanding will be removed. Tu quoque will be moderated. Links to bogus news sites (and worse) will be deleted.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say it, it's important enough to put a name to it.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.