Guest post from Laissez faire Books
Secret donors. Wasteful construction projects. Back room deals with special interests. Tax breaks for select groups. And rampant corruption.
If you think I'm describing to you all the problems of our government and opposition ... think again. No, this is what's currently going on in Brazil right now. And it's all because of the World Cup.
But what's going on in Brazil is a great example of why you're stuck with the terrible government you currently have. Let me explain.
In case you don't know, the World Cup is the premiere soccer tournament in the world. Countries send their best players and compete on the global scale. It's estimated that close to 1 billion people tune into the games.
And for a country like Brazil, with one of the most dedicated soccer fan base in the world, it should be an honour to host the games. Instead tens of thousands of Brazilians have been protesting in the streets, enraged by the waste and corruption that's resulted from the planning and preparation.
At the same time, word of even worse abuses are coming out about the 2022 World Cup preparations in Qatar. So bad they may be stripped of the games. Why then, does this event go on? It's because of a problem that's inherent in events like this. And it carries over to governments.
People love the World Cup, regardless of the corruption and problems created by its organizers, the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) It may be bad, but no FIFA means no World Cup, and for millions of people around the world, no World Cup would be worse.
The same goes for bad government. No matter how much people on all sides complain about government waste and corruption, eliminating government is never an option for them because they don't want to give up their piece of the pie. Government might be bad, but losing Social Security or welfare or subsidized health care would be worse.
They'll quietly give up their civil rights because the government promises them safety and security. And they can't imagine living without it.
People will continue to gripe. People will still holler for reform. And people will say they're going to vote the bums out of office and get new blood in power to clean up government.
But no one is willing to get rid of the system itself. And it's the system that causes all the problems.
As long as people value their own handouts more than fixing real problems, things aren't getting any better anytime soon. Keep that in mind in case you come across a World Cup match on TV...
If you want a better tomorrow, the voting booth isn't going to get you there. FIFA and the government isn't going anywhere. But fortunately, there was ways to live a better life regardless of what they do. In today's article by Forbes contributor Mark P. Mills, you'll learn about an innovative new service that's changing the way people travel. Even Brazil is taking advantage of it in light of the World Cup games.
The rest of the world isn't as receptive. But there might not be much they can do to stop the constant force of innovation.
The Regulatory State Versus Innovators
Brazil's regulators welcomed Airbnb's couch-surfing home-sharing solution to the shortage of hotel rooms for World Cup visitors. A lot of U.S. regulators aren't so happy with Airbnb, and similar Web-centric disruptions to traditional controls and taxes associated with the hotel industry. New York City -- and Paris to note another -- have mounted legal challenges against Airbnb.
Only a few years ago few people, especially in Washington D.C., had even heard of Airbnb. From the perspective of Washington D.C., Silicon Valley itself was long viewed as nerd central. No one thought "you got mail" or "apartment sharing" was transformative.
But the Internet turned 25 this year and not only have email and sharing-based e-commerce (Uber, Lyft, Yelp, Kickstarter, Wikipedia, etc), been recognized, belatedly, as leading indicators of something bigger, but the Valley has emerged as an epicenter of businesses with rising dominance in every corner of society and the economy. Somewhere along the way, the regulatory state awoke to that reality.
(A related overview of "disruptive regulation" is in my recent City Journal article.)
There is a long history to such technology trajectories. Consider the apocryphal story about Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer and the great 19th century physicist, Faraday -- one of the true fathers of electrification. Upon seeing a demonstration of electromagnetic force, the Chancellor, amazed, asked "but of what use is it?" To which Faraday replied: "Why sir, one day you will tax it."
Taxation is just one, albeit favoured, form of how government regulates, constrains and seeks to direct the private sector, especially its "transformative technologies."
Transformations are ultimately measured by money. Of the 15 most profitable American companies today, four are in tech. Of the remaining 11, four are in finance, just two are involved with oil, two in retail, one pharma and one industrial.
But the ability for today's innovators to operate, to disrupt, and to make a profit -- hype aside, every tech company is eventually measured by profitability -- is, like old-school business, impacted by the same regulatory state.
The regulatory regimes include but are not limited to:
1. Taxes --Tech companies are amongst the biggest holders -- or for some, "hoarders" -- of the $2 trillion in profits languishing offshore due to onerous U.S. tax policies. (The reason, by the way: the U.S., which used to have the lowest corporate tax rate in the industrial world; now has the highest.)
Tech executives were grilled by Congress last year for "avoiding" taxes, including the CEO of Apple, who defended the company's entirely legal practices. The Affordable Care Act surprised many in tech with its imposition of a tax on software applied to health domains.
2. Consumer services -- Now moving far beyond restaurant bookings, taxis and hotel rooms, Silicon Valley innovators are rolling out Web-based alternatives to old models in everything, including medical diagnostics. Airbnb isn't the only target in what the Atlantic calls Uber Wars: the FDA reigned-in 23andMe's low-cost consumer DNA services. There will be a lot more.
3. Transportation -- Whether in the air with drones or on the streets with autonomous cars, the tech community is abuzz with possibilities. But the regulators, the FAA and Department of Transportation respectively, have grounded the first and put the brakes on the second domain.
4. Privacy -- The fallout from the firestorm over Edward Snowden's leaks of National Security Agency (NSA) activities arguably shifted the focus of the White House's May 2014 big data report away from the potential for economic stimulus to cyber security, and what the government should do to reign in the private sector (notably, not so much the government's own activities).
[Ed. note: While D.C. doesn't have any solutions on how to protect your privacy, we do. Check out our free report and start locking down your personal information today.]
5. Education -- MOOCs (massive online open courses) are starting to shake up at least one corner of the traditional education market. One of the leaders in online education, Coursera, recently found itself in violation of Minnesota education regulations.
6. Child safety -- Both technology and behaviours have evolved rapidly since Congress passed the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) back in the "ancient" year 2000. Eight states since have enacted legislation to control the sharing of, for example, student data in the wake of parental worries about information used by companies like InBloom which can deploy analytics to track and help students. InBloom ended up shutting down despite over $100 million in venture investment, including funds from the Gates Foundation.
7. Ownership -- Who owns personal data? It's about more than your children's school performance, or your personal health data, or your kid's behaviour (myriad "black box" plug-ins can track your teen driver's behaviour).
Your smartphone knows where you are, where you were, and what you buy. Your Web surfing, or geo-located picture posts, help advertisers, but also reveal a lot about you. And as I write, the Supreme Court is considering whether information found by police in a smartphone amounts to unreasonable search.
8. Intellectual Property -- Who owns what kind of company IP? Combine 3D scanners and 3D printers and entire new vistas of copyright and patent challenges emerge, including controls and taxes over the export/import of certain products that can now be shipping virtually as a digital file.
9. Discrimination -- Big data analytics can yield superior business intelligence, better health or insurance outcomes, or lower lending credit risks. However, as the White House prominently asserts in its Big Data report, analytics may also lead to "subtle and not-so-subtle forms of discrimination."
10. Labour practices -- Silicon Valley is taking heat for underrepresentation of women and ethnic minorities (one bellwether here: Jesse Jackson's appearance last month at HP's annual meeting); for outsourcing to China; for obtaining key minerals from substandard African mines; and as noted earlier, for colluding to prevent employee poaching.
The irony is that tech employees are dominantly Millennials (the average age at Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple is in the 28 to 33 range), a generation that is famously and proudly inclusive.
11. Immigration -- Tech's biggest players, from Bill Gates to Mark Zuckerberg, are all weighing in on this politically charged issue through all the standard means, including a new lobby group, FWD.us.
12. Energy -- Telephones once sipped electricity and could be kept operating for days thanks to vaults filled with old-fashioned car-type batteries. Now smartphones and tablets depend on thousands of warehouse-scale data centers that each inhale city-scale quantities of electricity. The Internet rivals aviation's energy consumption.
Consequently, Greenpeace, amongst others seek regulatory controls of tech's energy-consuming requirements.
13. Governance -- The current system of global Internet governance is now up for debate. When the White House announced (and since punted) a plan to cede control over domain naming and associated oversight to some "international community," industry insiders, and many in Congress, were surprised to discover the vagueness of the associated legal authorities.
14. Service rights -- The center of the debate over "net neutrality" is whether and how to regulate access to the Internet, whether it is a right subject to similar regulation as say water and electricity. It is a quintessential Washington issue: who pays for what, how much authority does a business have over its own assets? Can carriers charge more for fast lanes?
All of these issues are divorced from the technological and economic accomplishments, the conveniences, freedoms, and entertainment that billions of people enjoy because of the emergence of what will soon become the world's largest infrastructure.
The new reality was captured by one San Jose councilman, who noted that the city at the epicentre of the tech revolution is facing the same crushing public-service pension debts and related political conflicts as other cities: "We're Silicon Valley, we're not Detroit. It shouldn't be happening here."
It is happening to the tech sector and it's just the beginning. Brazil might welcome the disruption. Don't count on the regulators in the old economies to be so welcoming.
Mark P. Mills is CEO of Digital Power Group, a tech and investment advisory, and a Senior Fellow with the Manhattan Institute. He co-authored the energy-tech book "The Bottomless Well," and his views on Big Data are in a forthcoming book.
This article originally appeared here on Forbes.com, and republished at Laissez Faire Today.