Wednesday, 10 November 2010

Genetic engineering: it’s been happening since the dawn of time

Writing this morning in the New York Times,James Mcwilliams takes on the idea of genetic modification as “unnatural.”  Bureaucrats and anti-GE activists (those few that still exist) insist that transferring genes from one species to another is “unnatural.” That genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) are “unnatural.”

_Quote The UK’s Health and Safety Executive … explains that genetic modification occurs when the genetic material of an organism (either DNA or RNA) is altered by use of a method that does not occur in nature. The anti-biotech Non-GMO Project notes that genetic modification creates combinations of plant, animal, bacteria, and viral genes that do not occur in nature. The Huffington Post plugged last October as non-GMO month on the grounds that genetic modification produces goods through processes that do not occur in nature. Greenpeace has described breaching species barriers as unnatural. Daily Kos insists that gene splicing does not occur in nature. In a word: frankenfood.
    Well, you know where this is going. Scientists have now confirmed what evolutionary geneticists have long suspected nature does produce GMOs. Swedish researchers discovered an enzyme-producing gene in a meadow grass that naturally crossed into sheep’s fescue about 700,000 years ago. The most plausible explanation, said Professor Bengt O. Bengtsson of Lund University, is that the gene was transmitted by a parasite or pathogen, such as a virus, perhaps with the help of a sap-sucking insect.
    The fact that cross-species gene transfer happens without human intervention in nature, however rare, provides further justification for viewing transgenic technology not as a Frankensteinian intervention into the natural world, but as yet another method of trait selection, something we’ve been doing with heroic results since the dawn of agriculture… [hat tip AgBioWorld]

So the objections to GE as “unnatural” fall to the ground.


  1. You're absolutely right PC, and yYou're probably surprised to learn that creationists have discussed such topics for years as well. There's a lot of evidence to suggest there is or was quite an active "biomatrix".

    For those interested: this is part of research to account for viruses and parasites, i.e. bad things. They might be remnants of originally good things (the biomatrix) giving the ability for certain kinds of horizontal gene transfers, but have now devolved (lost their original function).

  2. Christian Libz10 Nov 2010, 09:47:00

    That's how God created us, via divine intervention in genetic modification.

  3. So God will be taking responsibility for all the fuck ups too then CL...?

  4. Sorry guys, horizontal gene transfer doesn't turn go into you.

  5. American Extremist10 Nov 2010, 13:00:00

    I want some hair genes from a woolly mammoth. Where can I get those, and how can fasten them to my head? When I look like Lysander Spooner, 'The Daily Kos's' powers will be useless against me.

  6. Carrots were purple until the Dutch genetically engineered them to be orange in honour of William.


1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.