“Capill denied parole”
Graham Capill, remember him? “Capill denied parole” is the headline. A better headline would have been “Creationist, moralising, hypocrite child molester denied parole.” That’d be an example of “truth in sentencing.” But let’s stop with the grammatical jokes. As my friend Russell Watkins says at his SunLive blog,
“It really is hard to believe this creep – once a stiffer-sentences, anti-gay, anti-prostitution-law-reform and anti-sex-before-marriage campaigner - would have the gumption to go for parole after interfering with children.
“If he had any decency, or wanted to set a real example of what he once told us he stood for, he’d ask to be locked up for good.”
Don’t know about you, but I wouldn’t be upset if that were to happen.