Thursday, 11 September 2014

“The left has already won this election”

She’s right, you know. 

Josie Pagani, that is, saying National is coasting on its rival's policy:

The left has already won this election.
    John Key's National Party is still high in the polls, not because the values of the right are popular, but because National's pitch is essentially, "Trust us to implement Labour policy. We'll spend a bit less than them doing it, and if you're lucky we'll give you a tax cut from the savings -- maybe."
    The left won the contest of ideas a long time ago, and National has completely capitulated… promising only to administer the policy wins of the left.

On that, she’s absolutely right. On the battle of ideas, the left has already won this election. It’s so patently obvious it need hardly be debated.

Where she’s wrong is assuming that’s a good thing.

She says it’s a good thing for example that

_Quote_IdiotNational has rolled over and accepted the left's analysis that … the market can't fix everything. [That] National held its nose and intervened to rebuild Christchurch and fix the failing housing market.

Yet, when was the market given an opportunity to rebuild Christchurch? It worked very well until 4 hours after the earthquake when the government took over and closed the city down.

And, when has the market been given a chance to fix the failing housing market? It had been working moderately well for umpty-tum years until increasing council costs (brought on by Sandra Lee’s 2001 Local Government Act intervention) and the increasing planning stranglehold on land (brought on largely by National’s 1993 Resource Management Act) began sending housing costs through the roof – and even while supply went through the floor demand has been kept high by newly issued debt courtesy of the Reserve Bank.

Being at the intersection of the three of the most heavily regulated and interventionist “markets” in the land – building, planning and money creation – all areas that have been reformed from the “leftist” menu -- it’s no surprise that what the housing “market” has managed to deliver has been large gains for some at the expense of misery for many.

Such is the pattern of heavily regulated and interventionist “markets” everywhere.

And it’s no surprise to discover that the leftist-inspired top-down solutions in Christchurch have failed to set anything alight apart from anger and resentment and very little rebuilding that really deserves the name.

Such is the general pattern when governments attempt to direct markets in direction people don’t wish to go.

Such would be the tragedy repeated in every other area should the Nats’ ideological capitulation be given voice in the other areas Josie would have them further gum up: in “actively managing the economy in favour of exporters and producers” (and so lowering the dollar that it would reduce real wages for everyone); in further raising minimum wages (and so locking out teenagers and the  low-waged from ever rising up the employment ladder); in regulating the prices of energy companies (guaranteeing both shortages and falling energy investment); and in tying up “the supermarket duopoly” (all but guaranteeing either shortages or rising prices).

Josie’s right that for years the Nats have capitulated in every ideological battle they have encountered – bringing always and in every policy debate just a pop gun to the left’s ideological nuclear weapons.  As Lindsay Perigo and myself and undoubtedly many others have and will have pointed out, this is the real reason, if there is one, for what the left have called “dirty politics.” 

But where Josie is very wrong is in assuming the Nats’ “management” of their capitulation has made anyone outside the immediate political arena better off.


  1. For a bit of humour and light relief, here is National's vision for NZ, "What we stand for" (a.k.a. principles)
    The National Party seeks a safe, prosperous, and successful New Zealand that creates opportunities for all New Zealanders to reach their personal goals and dreams.
    We believe this will be achieved by building a society based on the following values:
    • Limited government
    • Individual freedom and choice
    • Personal responsibility•

    Equal citizenship and equal opportunity
    • Competitive enterprise and reward for achievement
    • Strong families and caring communities
    • Sustainable development of our environment•
    Loyalty to our country, its democratic principles, and our Sovereign as Head of State
    • National and personal security

  2. On the battle of ideas, the left has already won this election

    I've been saying that for the last 6 years. John Key as a prettier face on Helen Clark's policies.

    Actually, it's even worse than that: whether it's borrowing, gay marriage, settlements, benefit increases --- Key's government hasn't just kept Clark's policies, it's kept moving even further left.

    when was the market given an opportunity to rebuild Christchurch?

    That's because there is absolutely no economic case to "rebuild" Christchurch. The govt should have discharged the insurance, bulldozed the infrastructure, disincorporated the city. The idea that a small country like NZ can somehow "rebuild" in five or ten years a city that took 150 years to grow is completely mad and economically illiterate.

    .. fix the failing housing market?

    but NZ's housing market isn't failing. Anyone with either globally transferrable skills (and thus a globally competitive salary) or true nett worth has no problems buying houses in NZ. Uncompetitive bludgers don't deserve houses.

  3. Hahaha you must be havin a laugh to call National right wing right???? When you say NATIONAL I SAY SOCIAL.
    Its the merger the corporate and state baby

  4. Yes,
    quote 'Yet, when was the market given an opportunity to rebuild Christchurch? It worked very well until 4 hours after the earthquake when the government took over and closed the city down"

    We took a 40 billion dollar hit, thats only $10,000 for every man woman and child.
    We expected the disaster to be Nationalised.
    Instead we were circumscribed, cordoned off and left, and we will not forget you Auckland.


1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.