Tuesday, 16 November 2010

There’s Pansy … [updated]

"There's pansies, that's for thoughts."
- Ophelia, Hamlet

The fall of disgraced minister Pansy Wrong offers both thoughts and opportunities.

To lose one minister for abuse of office is an accident. To lose two looks like carelessness. John Key knows that’s what we’re all thinking.

Key says Wrong should not answer questions about her abuse of her parliamentary office to those who paid for her and her husband’s holidays and business trips, i.e., the taxpayers, until all the facts about her abuse of those trips and that office are known.

Translation (straight from the Sir Humphrey Appleby Handbook): “This problem is a bloody nuisance, but we hope that by the time Parliamentary Services reports, four months from now, everyone will have forgotten about it or we can find someone else to blame.*

The fact is that she knows the facts. And if she doesn’t, she’s incompetent. So she should answer now either to her dishonesty or to her incompetence—or both. Now, not when the story has blown over.

The flatulence of John Key on this is disgraceful.

But the demise of the minister of Ethnic Affairs and Women’s Affairs offers a heaven-sent opportunity for him to be decisive.

As the former minister shuffles off into the dustbin of history, he should grasp this as the ideal; opportunity to put the ministries there too over which she presided with such anonymity. Announce that it’s time for them to stop spending money we don’t have to produce reports no-one reads. Time, in other words, to take a hike.

In all the years of their existence, it’s not like they’ve actually achieved anything with all the money we’ve been forced to spend on them.

That’s just one opportunity.

And it offers the opportunity too to declare than MPs will no longer receive the perks about which they’ve demonstrably shown they can’t be trusted to be honest.  They must be confiscated without compensation—the only appropriate reaction in a deep recession.

This is surely however an idea whose time has come.

Naturally, however, since such opportunities exist for the PM to be decisive, this flatulent status-quo worshipper will do neither.

UPDATE: You can always rely on David Farrar to completely fail to understand that there’s a world outside Wellington.

The Royal NZ Herald reports:

_Quote An increase to MPs’ salaries is almost inevitable if the Prime Minister’s bid to get rid of their foreign-travel perks is successful.

To which the pink Tory responds:

_QuoteIt is.

Well, no, David. It is not. Or should not be. But what might help make it inevitable is lame-arse lame-brained “analysis” like yours, suggesting these overpaid burdens on the taxpayer deserve more of the same instead of the kick in the pants they deserve.

In case you and your coterie of Beehive Bludgers hadn’t noticed (which you haven’t), whatever your jacked up figures say, we out here in the real world are in middle of a quite severe recession.

Such a time is not the time to increase salaries. It’s a time to cut them—and really quite savagely. It’s a time for these highly-paid and highly-visible beneficiaries to lead by example.

Pansy’s abuse (on top of abuse by legions of others, including Roger Douglas and Rodney Hide) is the ideal opportunity to do that.

In my submission, if anyone were to listen to the Manatee’s ill-thought rationalisations for raising MPs’ salaries then, it would be an(other) example of the benighted following the delusional.


  1. Spot on. Key had the golden opportunity to steer this once-great country away from the PC minefield that Labour created under Helen's long watch. But in the interests of status, power, glamour and greed, he has blown it, and nothing much has changed. Labour Lite, and with a vengeance. Since the Christchurch earthquake, the Key govt is looking shaky, and the Teflon is wearing thin.

  2. So DPF is right?

    The removal of "perks" will lead to an increase in wages. You say that shouldnt happen. You dont argue that it wont.

    This is what he says, "An increase to MPs’ salaries is almost inevitable..."

    And this is what you say, "It is not. Or should not be."

    He is talking about the real world, you are talking about some fantasy world. You might not like it, but that doesnt mean that it is incorrect.

  3. @Kimble, It's made almost inevitable because of pontificators like him from inside the elect who say "I will" when they really mean "I should"--and because of people who are paying for it listen and can say only "Oh well."

  4. David Farrar is a cleaner for the National Party. When the party goes to toilet, Mr Farrar is there straight away to mop up the mess afterwards. If there is no toilet paper, then Mr Farrar supplies one. If there is no refreshener in the toilet, then Mr Farrar provides one. In his duty as a National-ass-licker, he makes sure that the National party itself is well-looked after in the toilet.


1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.