Wednesday, May 19, 2010

The theme tonight is ‘Sacrifice’ [updated]

The artistic theme tonight is the morality of sacrifice—of which,I am not a fan.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH AT YOUTUBE

The video linked above begins the theme.  Its an excerpt from “John Galt’s Speech,” by Ayn Rand, given visual form as part of an ongoing project by YouTube user GaltSpeaking. (Embedding of the video is disallowed, so click here or on the pic above to watch it.)  Appropriately, perhaps, it’s Episode 14. Consider it.

126582479-M The sculpture by Australian artist Rayner Hoff is called ‘Sacrifice.’  Few twentieth-century sculptures celebrate the morality of sacrifice more nobly. More starkly. More appropriately.

4409957663_751ba34c74

Under a morality of sacrifice, the standard of value is not your own happiness, but that of others.  Not your own prosperity, but that of others.  Not your own life, but those of others. (As W.H Auden sarcastically summarises, “We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I can’t imagine.”)

The result of all this sacrifice amounts to a row of zeroes; or as the excerpt from Galt’s Speech linked above points out:

"Under a morality of sacrifice, the first value you sacrifice is morality…"

Think about it.

In the meantime, and as an antidote, let’s talk about happiness. “What else could be more important?”

Labels: , , , ,

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anon1 said...

Rand: "The pursuit of happiness means a man's right to set his own goals, to choose his values, and to achieve them. Happiness means that state of consciousness which comes from the achievement of your values."

That sounds pretty reasonable to me. But wait, there's more.

Rand, next sentence: "But happiness does not mean simply momentary pleasure."

Wait a minute - I thought I got to choose my own values.

Wrong! Rand decides: "Happiness means a profoud, guiltless, rational feeling of self-esteem and of pride in one's own achievements. It means the enjoyment of life which is possible only to the rational man on a rational court of morality."

So what if my values mean that I am fulfilled by the constant pursuit of momentary pleasure? Who is Rand to tell Quagmire that he can't experience true happiness? How does Rand know whether the way certain people live their lives makes them truely happy or not? What gives Rand the right to make her own concept of "rationalty" the definition of happiness?

Your thoughts PC?

5/20/2010 06:49:00 pm  
Blogger PC said...

Anon1: You ask, "So what if my values mean that I am fulfilled by the constant pursuit of momentary pleasure? Who is Rand to tell Quagmire that he can't experience true happiness?"

It's not Rand telling him, it's reality. The fact is, you can't buy long-term happiness by means of irrational short-term pleasures. They add up to nothing across a lifetime, and potentially lead to disaster.

To illustrate.

If you want to pursue momentary pleasures at the price of long-term destruction, by heavy use of psychotic drug highs for example, then your argument is not with Rand, but with reality.

5/20/2010 07:26:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

<< Home