I know there are plenty of intelligent readers out there with plenty to say about all the new theft announced this afternoon, so let’s use the power of the internet to get your thoughts recorded here.
Which is to say, this is an Open Debate on the Budget.
Go to it!
UPDATE 1: Some good comments already from around the traps.
Liberty Scott: “Oh NOW I know why you voted for Labour National, David Farrar makes it clear it is about staying in power for three terms. Quite why you'd choose the blue team over the red team to keep implementing the red team's policies is beyond me.”
Cactus Kate: “Smile and Wave wasn't elected to increase taxes. If case studies [like Gooner’s] show in effect he has … then he will hear about it… So far it smells like the left hand robbing the right hand and dropping crumbs on the way.”
UPDATE 2: Alex Tarrant has a relatively neutral short summary of the major announcements in this Tax, Tax and Tax Budget.
My even shorter summary: Welfare benefits are up. Taxes are up--except income tax & company tax, whose slight fall is more than outweighed by the increases in GST and tobacco, by removing depreciation, and by the imminence of the insane Emissions Tax Scam.
And remember that election promise of tax cuts? Fuggedaboudit! Spending and borrowing is up, up, up. The total tax burden is now higher than it ever was before; yet this government is still borrowing around a quarter-a-billion a week just to keep it in profligacy.
UPDATE 3: Imperator Fish is carrying Budget 2010 live:
“1:58pm: Bill English is looking fabulous in his trademark black suit, and the camera is adoring him.
2:01pm: English places the One Ring on his finger and begins speaking.
2:22pm: English announces everyone will get a pony. Those on lower tax brackets will get dead ones.
[Read on for more]”
UPDATE 4: NBR’s Nevil Gibson recycles the government spin:
“The government’s decision to go ahead with across-the-board income tax cuts and make a surprise drop in the corporate rate, even if offset by a rise in consumer taxes, show it's a world away from its predecessor, which saw tax as a means of sharing rather than generating wealth.
“You could call it the ‘tall poppies’ budget, because it will benefit those who are likely to do most to lift New Zealanders’ living standards, reduce the government’s deadweight impact on the economy, and provide greater rewards to those who deserve it…
“Today’s budget won’t provide any ‘step change’ in the economy [he sure got that right – Ed.]—but it will finally unwind some of [Cullen’s] more egregious drags on the economy, while also trying to keep government spending increases to a minimum during a time of recovery. For NBR’s full budget coverage click here.
More to come, no doubt.
6 comments:
The real scary part of the budget is in the projections:
Quote:
Also crucial to achieving a fiscally balanced tax package over the next four years will be the success of the Inland Revenue Department in cracking down on tax avoidance and evasion, including in the "black" economy where no tax is paid.
Additional funding for IRD is forecast to produce an additional $210 million a year in taxes, based on its success rate of a five-to-one payback from spending on tax investigations.
Mark Hubbard
I just turned on the TV and I caught part of the comment by daft Labour MP, David Parker who has just quoted something that Bernard Hickey said recently in which he said Hickey was correct.
If our MPs don't invest time to learn about economics but get their information from idiot economic oracle like Bernard Hickey, then I think that we have no hope because our politicians are definitely incompetent & illiterate.
So the loss of depreciation of buildings which have an expected life of greater than 50 years will be non depreciable.... the interesting point of this is that the building materials industry has only had an expected life of 50years, Does that Mean that structural components will now be able to be depreciated, because the company who made the product, states it's life is that long? With the loss of depreciation ability, are we now able to write off the building component in total when the property is redeveloped? If not why not?
Overall a no balls budget, They may have started to address some of the tax issues, but govt is a 2 way street, where is the abandoment of the ridiculous ministries, the forfeiture of politician gimme's, the quango culling, the limitation in increases in govt expenditure in line with inflation and population?
Bill you fail
John Key really is NZ's Bush.
Next up: Your Obama. Dark days ahead.
"John Key really is NZ's Bush."
I'd vote for a Brazilian then.
twr: hahah! Nice one!
Post a Comment