Sunday, 14 February 2010

Larry Elder Gives Paul Krugman a Fisking

[Guest post by Jeff Perren]

In a recent Investors Business Daily editorial, Larry Elder gives Paul Krugman a very thorough – and soul-satisfying – fisking. Granted, that's easier and easier these days, but it's pleasant to watch nonetheless.

Elder begins:
In a November 2004 interview, Krugman criticized the "enormous" Bush deficit.
"We have a world-class budget deficit," [Krugman] said, "not just as in absolute terms, of course — it's the biggest budget deficit in the history of the world — but it's a budget deficit that, as a share of GDP, is right up there."
The deficit in fiscal 2004 was $413 billion, or 3.5% of gross domestic product.
Back then, a disapproving Krugman called the deficit "comparable to the worst we've ever seen in this country. ... The only time postwar that the United States has had anything like these deficits is the middle Reagan years, and that was with unemployment close to 10%."
Then, Elder goes on to — yeah, I know, shooting fish in a barrel – show how the nature of Krugman's complaints are highly dependent on who is in office.

Elder then observes:
The projected deficit for fiscal year 2010 is over $1.5 trillion, or more than 10% of GDP. This sets a post-WWII record in both absolute numbers and as a percentage of GDP. And if the Obama administration's optimistic projections of economic growth fall short, things will get much worse.
Yet, the winner of the Fauxbel Prize in Economics appears unphased.
"[F]ear-mongering on the deficit may end up doing as much harm as the fear-mongering on weapons of mass destruction."
It goes without saying — or should among this audience — that Bush was a profligate spender to the point of idiocy, not to mention no friend of economic liberty, in general.

Still, it's good to see Krugman being flayed with his own words for his utter hypocrisy, even if hypocrisy is the least of the Progressive's sins. (They're much more dangerous when they're completely sincere.) And, given his perch from The New York Times, it can only help to have the toad's inconsistencies openly revealed.

Sometimes, even the non-cynical among us can enjoy a moment of guilt-free Schadenfreude.

[Cross-posted at Shaving Leviathan.]

1 comment:

  1. However, Krugman got one thing right.
    He recognizes there is Zoned land and Flatland in the US and that in Zoned land housing is unaffordable and in flatland housing is affordable and that the Smart Growth brigade actually caused the Global Financial Crisis.
    So he joins the ranks of yours truly, Don Brash and Arthur Grimes and a host of others around the world.

    However, the Herald prefers the received wisdom of Gary Taylor, the famous Urban Economist and Tim Hazeldine who sadly is head of the Dept of Economics at Auckand University.

    The Greens rule.
    And the Herald embeds my simply rule of thumb "If the Herald promotes a theory you can guarantee it is wrong."


1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.