Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Cash for conquests

haka_2301 We are about to get a taste of the new Government’s approach to Treaty negotiations, and it looks like this National-led Government is going to be as generous in doling out taxpayers’ money for imagined slights as the last National-led Government .

The Ngati Toa deal is instructive.  Only in modern New Zealand would copyright protection for an unpublished chant extend back nearly two-hundred years (as long, at least, as you have the right skin colour), and taxpayers’ money and an apology given to the descendants of a stone killer for the treatment of said killer.

Ngati Toa are about to be given buckets full of taxpayers’ cash to apologise for things those taxpayers haven’t done, along with an apology for the “kidnapping and detention of 18 months” of Ngati Toa chief Te Rauparaha – the “kidnapping and detention” of whom was the consequence of his having tortured, slaughtered and murdered in cold blood from Waikato to Taranaki to the Horowhenua to Kapiti to the Cook Strait to Wairau to Kaikoura to Kaiapoi to Akaroa.

He went everywhere, man, and a trail of corpses was left behind him – and the bucketfuls of cash now promised are paying for what those corpses bought him.

Te Rauparaha’s Akaroa slaughter gives you the character of this “warrior” still so revered by the tribe*.  The argument with the Banks Peninsula Maori began when Te Rauparaha exhumed and ate the decomposing body of their chieftain’s grandmother, which must have tasted grand after being dead for several months, and concluded with a carefully planned torture and slaughter of the chieftain and his family and the sacking of his pa – after which he headed home carrying “500 baskets of human flesh … destined for cannibal feasts at Te Rauparaha’s settlement on Kapiti island,”* a settlement he had stripped from the inhabitants only a few years earlier after an earlier slaughter, and on which he maintained slaves “scraping flax” to be traded for arms and ammunition for further conquests.

It should be no surprise that Te Rauparaha was an enthusiast for the Treaty – he reasoned that after his two-decade reign of terror he could use the Treaty and the protection of naive British governance to “confirm his dominion” over his recent conquests – all of which had been seized in two decades of war before the Treaty was signed, and many of which he had conquered only in order to onsell to New Zealand Company agents (who, to their disgrace, were the knowing beneficiaries of his blood lust).

Little did he know how successful his ruse would be, or for how long.  His blood-soaked “dominions” are being paid for still, just as this murderer had hoped, since for the most part it is those very lands he obtained by bloodshed for which his descendants are today being  rewarded with our largesse.

Such is modern justice in New Zealand.

Labels: , , , ,

5 Comments:

Blogger Dave Mann said...

Geez Peter. I haven't checked the facts on your story I'm afraid, although I knoe this fucker was a bloothirsty SOB... but if half of this is true, then tis is a disgusting state of affairs.

None of waht you have written need be true anyway, for it to be an idiotic travesty that we are throwing shitloads of money at these people and seem to be st to continue to do so for the forseeable future.

God Defe Help New Zealand

2/11/2009 11:48:00 am  
Blogger Elijah Lineberry said...

Excellent post, Peter! ...a disgrace that taxpayers have to fork out all this money.

No doubt you will receive a great many handwringing comments, lace panty resignations and abuse for this but at least some of us are telling the truth.

2/11/2009 11:49:00 am  
Blogger Dave Mann said...

My comment above was sponsored by the Adult Literacy Trust (and I'm sure you'll support my membership - lol).

Sorry about the errors. I was too worked up to use the 'preview' button.

2/11/2009 11:54:00 am  
Blogger Stevew said...

It puzzles me that New Zealand has been allowed to get away with apartheid for so long. Indeed, there is even a national holiday each year to celebrate it.
Shouldn't other nations be boycotting our cricketers?

2/11/2009 01:36:00 pm  
Anonymous LGM said...

Stevew

Naaah. They're all into it as well.

Trouble is that when people start fixating about some non-essential attribute (like what race or religion they reckon they are), then they get involved with all sorts of nasty behaviour.

I am reading a book about Poland during WW2 at the moment. First the Russians invaded the Eastern half, then the Germans invaded it and then the Russians came back again. There were three nationalities present in the territory. Each of the invading forces encouraged two of the groups to go on the rampage against the other. People were more than happy to oblige and needed little encouragement to get right out of hand. See if you can guess the identities of the three groups!

Not much has changed really. In a few more decades people won't believe anything like that really could happen. Take the US occupation troops out of Europe and watch the civil wars bloom.

LGM

2/11/2009 11:38:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

Links to this post:

<< Home