Thursday, September 13, 2007

In praise of industry and human production ...

Any historians in the audience? Without Googling to find out, have you any idea who wrote this remarkable piece of prose? I assure you, the answer will be both surprising and enlightening -- and will be posted here at lunchtime if no-one has it by then. [Words have been changed only slightly in order to deter would-be queue jumpers, and because I can.]
Across the span of scarce one hundred years, entrepreneurs and industrialists have created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of Nature's forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents or cultivation, canalisation or rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground - what earlier century had even an inkling that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of human endeavour?
It makes one almost proud to be a bourgeois, doesn't it.

These words were written in the mid-nineteenth century - its author achieved worldwide popularity in the twentieth. How rare to hear such a hymn to human industry in the twenty-first.

Labels: , , , ,

7 Comments:

Anonymous JustinRaine said...

I'll take a stab and say Marx (based solely on the dates).

9/13/2007 10:05:00 am  
Anonymous Falafulu Fisi said...

Was it Andrew Carnegie?

9/13/2007 10:40:00 am  
Anonymous Karl Marx said...

It was me

9/13/2007 10:43:00 am  
Anonymous Phil (Pacific Empire) said...

Yep and this is what he said about the state:

"This executive power, with its enormous bureaucratic and military organization, with its ingenious state machinery, embracing wide strata, with a host of officials numbering half a million, beside an army of another half million, this appalling parasitic body. . . enmeshes the body of French society like a net and chokes all its pores."

Sounds almost libertarian, doesn't it.

9/13/2007 03:46:00 pm  
Anonymous David S. said...

See, Marx wasn't all bad...

9/13/2007 03:54:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not too suprising. I bear very little resentment towards the the very first supporters of Marx. We must remember that in Marx's time, Capitalism and Aristocracy were virtualy identical. It would have been extreamly easy to see Buisinessmen and Politicians as one and the same (especialy when socialism had never been tested). All socialists following the soviet union, however, are idiots.

9/13/2007 04:12:00 pm  
Blogger Matt B said...

Karl Marx in the Communist Manifesto.

9/13/2007 11:48:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

<< Home