Saturday, June 02, 2007

Bradford & McCarten: Errors apparent

A few comments this morning on Eye to Eye clarified something for me.

SUE BRADFORD ARGUED that the death of Mrs Muliaga is "an indictment" of Max Bradford's "market reforms" of the electricity industry, "an indictment" of the cold-heartedness of capitalism, and a signal that all electrical producers should be taken back into the arms of the caring state and peremptorily renationalised.

Yet neither Mercury Energy nor Mighty River Power are private companies. Nor did Bradford's reforms take these power producers away from the arms of the state: These are both state organisations. Any resemblance to anything outside North Korea is entirely accidental.

SUE BRADFORD ARGUED that access to electrical power is a right.

At the same time her colleagues in the Greens are doing everything they possibly can to make the production of power more and more difficult; everything they can to raise costs by having extensive restrictions and carbon taxes and the like placed on existing power plants; they're enthusiastic supporters of Kyoto, which guarantees to make power more expensive, and the RMA, which makes it all but impossible to reliably transport power to NZ's largest city; and they're doing everything they possibly can to stop the production of new power plants, cheering loudly every time their protests and the RMA between them sink new plans for more power (Think how they cheered when Project Aqua, Marsden B, and Genesis' Whanganui River hydro schemes were canned).

In the face of opposition such as that from her colleagues and supporters, how are the power companies supposed to keep producing cheap power and keep making it widely available, as she insists they must? How are they supposed to deliver this "right" that she talks about?

How? Somehow.

MATT MCCARTEN ARGUED that the person who switched off the power to the Muliaga's home should have known what would happen to poor Mrs Muliaga when he did that.

Yet he also argued that there was nothing wrong in the family (four sons in all, ranging from a seven-year-old to a twenty-one-year-old) sitting down for two hours with their dying mother to sing hymns, since they didn't know that she was dying... How, we have to wonder, was the poor contractor supposed to know what the family themselves apparently weren't aware of?

How? Somehow.


BRADFORD ARGUED THAT people shouldn't leap to judgement by "playing politics," and McCarten argued that people shouldn't be condemning this family before the facts are known.

Yet even before the facts are known (and in complete disregard of the facts that are known) these two between them have leapt to make political capital out of this tragedy.

There's an error here in both of them that is far more than just one of logic.

UPDATE: What did Mrs Muliaga die from? On that, as Whale Oil suggests,
the quote of the week comes from Lindsay Perigo on Eye to Eye just after one of the socialists say her death should be blamed on poverty. Quote:Well she didn't die of starvation.
As I've said here before, poverty in South Auckland is generally not a shortage of money. It's an excess of poor choices. Today's Herald highlights the result for Mrs Muliaga of some of those choices.
Mrs Muliaga was fatally ill when she left hospital last month and not expected to live much longer. The obesity-related heart and lung disease which was killing Mrs Muliaga was being kept at bay by a cocktail of powerful medication - not the oxygen machine. Mrs Muliaga had previously turned her back on using the drugs to seek traditional Samoan health care...

Mrs Muliaga was suffering from cardiomyopathy - a weakness in the muscle of the heart brought on by a lack of oxygen being carried to the organ. The illness, lung disease and associated breathing difficulties were related to her obesity. She had been admitted to Middlemore Hospital in April and was discharged on May 11...

It was not the first time she had been hospitalised since the illness was diagnosed about five years ago. On previous hospital stays for the same problem, Muliaga had been told her lifestyle had to change or her health would not improve. This time, like previous times, she was stabilised and released with medication that would help relieve the symptoms. She was also given the oxygen machine, which is intended to assist her breathing - not to breathe for her.

When doctors who had treated her heard she had died after the power cut, they were astonished. On release, she was not so ill that the machine was critical to survival...

"No one should ever die because they can't pay a power bill," [said Mighty River Power chairwoman Carole Durbin].
And in this case, no one did. Shame on those who use tragedies like this to make political capital.

Labels: , , , ,

9 Comments:

Blogger Craig Ranapia said...

Also charming to see those two staunch champions of the worker shitting all over the contractor - apparently they don't need no stinking evidence to convict the man of heartlessly murdering a poor mother of four, begging for her life with her last breath, like some bastard out of a Victorian melodrama.

I'd prefer to quote David Beatson on Agenda about ten minutes earlier, who made the astute observation that "executions before trials are a very bad idea", and he's right. What a shame the likes of Clark, Bradford and McCarten don't give a shit anymore - if they ever did.

Kudos to Perigo and James Coleman for trying to inject some reason into the lynch mob, but you've got to wonder if they were doomed from the start. And could we now rename Eye to Eye - Shit for Brains would at least score points for truth in advertising.

6/02/2007 04:09:00 pm  
Anonymous Tim Wikiriwhi said...

Bradford is bonkers!
She is one of the brain dead who must not have seen the collapse of the Berlin wall.
Compare this socialist accusation against 'cold hearted capitalism' with the reality of India who for the sake of the poor to refusal to hinder capitalism to appease Global socialist greenism. The Sue Bradfords would hobble the world and have us dying like flies simply to satisfy their insanity! Linz's fellow ‘privileged Whiteman’ was quick to point out Bradford's party would basically outlaw electricity!
And Linz exposed their hollow piety by revealing the two faced off camera laughter of the racist MATT MCCARTEN opposite him.
The one funny thing was Bradford offering Mallard a pistol which is the socialist way of taking care of those comrades who bring the party into disrepute!
What is an even bigger joke is that Willy always has his end speech already done before the show thus regardless of the argument, Willy sprouts his political Bullshit unaffected by reasons generated by his own show! Is that Pig headed or what!

6/02/2007 04:18:00 pm  
Blogger Matt B said...

To my knowledge Bradford has not argued for Intelligent Design, Tim, so she's not completely crazy. Close enough to it, admittedly.

Where is your response to my questions?

6/02/2007 07:14:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

matt, tims on your side on this paticular topic, you should probably wait till a religion article comes up before you restart your argument with him.

6/02/2007 08:00:00 pm  
Blogger Oswald Bastable said...

I thought that living without electricity was some kind of virtue to the greenies!

As you say, they do all they can to hinder making more of it, thus driving up the price of power- then have the gall to say it is an essential service!

Translated that means they want to nationalise/steal it. if not, dump another steaming pile of red tape on all matters relating to the movement of electrons!

With the stink of hypocrisy still fresh, you may have notice that a corportion is automatically guilty.

How often have you heard the left defending some vile criminal, crying foul that the public have found him guilty without waiting for a trial...

6/02/2007 08:12:00 pm  
Anonymous Tim Wikiriwhi said...

Willy Jackson has one huge virtue over his peers.
Despite everything he has given Libertarians more air time on his show that all the rest combined. That does count for something.
Matt B
I will post you an answer to your questions shortly on the relevant thread.

6/03/2007 07:38:00 pm  
Blogger Matt B said...

matt, tims on your side on this paticular topic

So what?

, you should probably wait till a religion article comes up before you restart your argument with him.

Thanks for the heads up. I never knew a two line post could cause so much inconvenience.

Actually it has come up, and Tim is taking plenty of time to respond, and I don't want him to think its been forgotten.

6/03/2007 08:01:00 pm  
Anonymous Unique Articles said...

why do they call love handles love handles if nobody loves them?

6/04/2007 07:22:00 am  
Anonymous Andrew B said...

Disgusting:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/3/story.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10443428

6/04/2007 08:29:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

<< Home