Wednesday, 31 August 2005

An apologist for paedophiles speaks up

A 22 year old Nebraska loading-dock worker has been prosecuted for having sex with a thirteen year-old girl -- a girl for whom her mother took out a protection order against the 22 year-old. Too late. She is now fourteen, a high school student, married (for which the couple drove to Kansas), and a mother. Stories here, here, and here.

"Our position is we will prosecute cases where adult men are having sex with children," says the prosecutor, quite properly. Oddly enough, the paedophile has his apologists. Jim Peron saw fit to publish his apologia on his blog that
claims to be 'Looking in NZ'. I wonder what he thinks the relevance is to NZ? Perhaps you should ask him.


  1. Robert Winefield31 Aug 2005, 00:16:00

    "Koso and Guyer married in Kansas, which allows juveniles to marry with consent from their parents or guardians."

    First "Intelligent Design" and now this. I wonder if Dorothy and Toto hitched a ride on that Tornado in order to escape a paedophile with a wedding ring.


  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  3. Peter, I tend to agree with you on this issue. I am wondering however, whether you have any proof that Looking in NZ is indeed Jim Peron. I note that whoever it is does seem to have identical views to the man, but the writing just doesn't seem to be of the same style or, let it be said, the same quality.

  4. The post in question is about contradictory laws PC.The 22 year old is legally married to the 14 yr old girl but its an offence for them to have sex...wierd!Look is posting on the absurdity of this.Its about age of consent laws,not pedophila. Jims essay "The Kiddie porn panic" (sold in book form at Libz functions with nothing said)also deals with age of consent laws (a valid topic of debate for Libertairians),not the advocacy of pedophila.And Look has said he has a son so I question how this could be Jim...?

  5. James, the post in question from Peron is defending under-age sex. The marriage post-dated the sex, and took place when the girl was thirteen. And Jim's essay was ~never~ sold at any function at which I was present.

    Te Liberal, I've talked about the likelihood of LiNZ being a front for Peron here before, and each time I receive some sort of anonymous or abusive (or both) confirmation. There are a large number of things pointing towards it being him (including topics of interest to LiNZ, his choice of blog title and his disgust with the acronym LiNZ, times of posting, writing style, his unusually encyclopaedic knowledge of Peron's life story, viciousness to those who have 'crossed' Peron, speed to delete dissenting comments -- and it is of a piece with his bizarre interview of himself a few months ago) and there are none that I've seen pointing against. Broadcasts and the like that LiNZ talks about are all available on the net to someone outside New Zealand. (I haven't seen friend James's assertion that LiNZ has a son, which at this time is unproven.)

    Call it circumstantial if you like, but it does fit the facts very, very well.

  6. Well PC The essay was part of the book "Hating speech and other essays" which was sold by Jim at the Libz events he attended and was sold by Sally at Aristotles before Jim arrived in NZ to take over the running of the shop.And so it should have been,it was a great essay exposing the depths the State went to in entrapping people by selling them child porn it had itself created and pushed to them.The post on LiNZ does not display approval or disapproval of the actions of the people concerened,it just highlights the contadictions of the law in this case.

  7. Heres the link referring to LiNZ spending time with his did you miss this PC?

  8. I probably missed it because unlike you, James, I don't read every word Jim/LiNZ writes.

    I do note the convenience of LiNZ taking "a holiday" over the time of the Koln conference he/Peron was organising, and how his "computer troubles" and the time-consuming visit of his "son" occurred as his identity was first being questioned and the conference was upcoming...

  9. So you admit to not reading what Jim writes but are in no doubt when it comes to calling the man a advocate for pedophila...typical zealot.This was the same conference which was treated to the charm of Perigo sending out an email claiming the paticipants were pedophiles..? Babara Branden was most impressd at that description of herself I hear...;-0

  10. James, I have trouble reading anything that ~you~ write, let alone reading everything that Peron writes on ~his~ blog. Once again, your comment tails off into the indecipherable, about which I suspect only you and the other inhabitants of the Planet James know what you're talking about.

  11. Erk, how grotesque. It's child abuse -- equivocations on the matter make the James look like an apologist.

    And to think my blog linked to Jim Peron! His excresence is now off my blogroll.

  12. Yeah right Peasant.If you want to stay in the dark on the facts of this matter just keep reading PC....Who needs to have a word with Perigo real soon before this really comes back to haunt him!


1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.