Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Mallard's S&L scheme

Trevor Mallard's proposed student Savings and Loan (S&L) scheme has both good and bad. Story here. And let me make clear that my use of the term savings and loan scheme, ie., S&L, is purely for convenience, and is no reference at all to the S&L disaster in the US some years ago. Honestly it's not.

Anyway, the good news is that Labour has signalled, at least in part, that it recognises that education and paying for it is the responsibility of parents. And it's recognised that government itself has no ability to administer Mallard's S&L scheme. Great. That's as far as the good news goes.

The bad news is that taxpayers will be milked once again to pay for Mallard's S&L scheme, or at least to kick off each student's account. As with Labour's 'Welfare for Families' programme, they would rather make beneficiaries of New Zealanders than allow them their own money back by lowering taxes.

And the usual student politician suspects - fresh from arguing that students should be compelled by government force to join their student unions - have been bleating that taxpayers should be compelled to pay for the chosen lifestyles of these student politicians. Look for these bludgers to be sucking on the state tit for a lifetime.

What's my solution to help out students then? Charge 'em less and help 'em save. You can do both by cutting taxes to the bone - in fact as a libertarian I'd advocate cutting the bone as well. But the more cuts the better. Giving back the $9 billion surplus to those who paid for it would be a start. If Australia can slash taxes after an election, surely we can do so before? The May 19 budget could be a good time. (No, I'm not holding my breath either.)

But it would work: lower taxes means people have their own money back to help them save with, without then needing a welfare top-up from the government; lower taxes mean educational institutes themselves will have lower costs, so lower fees; lower taxes means low-income working families in Porirua and Mangere aren't being stolen from to pay for kids from Remuera and Khandallah to go to university.

So why not slash taxes to help parents fund their own savings scheme? This Government would rather make beneficiaries of those people not already made beneficiaries by 'Welfare for Families.' They'd rather we all mooched off the state.

3 Comments:

Anonymous sid said...

But, would NZers use the extra money from tax cut wisely?

And if many NZers do not use their extra money wisely, wouldn't this affect the rest who do?

I personally would choose to have the freedom to use my money as I see fit. But I recognise that there are many (excuse me) idiots out there.

What is the solution to this?

5/11/2005 10:12:00 am  
Blogger PC said...

Well, here's two quick answers to that, Sid.

The Government have been handing over some $259 million and counting to Te Wananga o Aotearoa, and wacthed while courses that Groucho Marx would reject as too absurd have been offered to students who enroil and are then never seen again. Do you think that money is being used wisely? Do you think the rest of the money government takes from you is used any more sensibly? Who exactly are the idiots?

And what gives anyone the right, you for example, to tell anyone else what they should do with their own money? You may not even agree with what I consider wise, let alone what Michael Cullen or Don Brash consider wise. And surely everyone is entitled to make their own choice as to what they consider 'wise,' or even if wisdom is something they even value. They should surely be free to make that choice for themselves, shouldn't they, as long as they are left free to take responsibility for their choices.

5/11/2005 10:44:00 am  
Blogger Duncan Bayne said...

Sid, you're right - there are a lot of idiots out there, who don't spend their money wisely.

The answer is simple: don't give them other people's money to spend, and don't spend other people's money on them.

Why do you expect people would learn to look after themselves - save for education, buy insurance, etc. etc., as long as you and I are taxed to provide that for them?

5/11/2005 01:33:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home