"Strangely, an entire social class has managed to go almost completely unnoticed. It is nothing less than the ruling class. And it is the most formidable and zealous enemy of free-market capitalism and individual freedom."

"Strangely, an entire social class has managed to go almost completely unnoticed. It is not to be found in history books or in newspaper articles. It is missing from academic and public discourse. Even the Marxists, who see the world entirely through the lens of class, have failed to spot it.
"It is odder still that this particular social class should be anonymous and invisible, because it is large, loud, unashamed, and bossy. It is the most powerful class in society. It is the class that constitutes the Establishment. It is nothing less than the ruling class. And it is the most formidable and zealous enemy of free-market capitalism and individual freedom.
"The problem of this missing class first occurred to me in the late 1990s, when I visited an anti-capitalist ‘climate’ rally in London. ... According to the Socialists, it is ‘the working-class’ who have most to gain by the overthrow of capitalism. ... But where, I wondered, at this anti-capitalist ‘climate’ jamboree, were the heroic, muscle-bound, lantern-jawed proletarians? ...
"The protesters cannot simply be labelled 'middle class' because ... the commercial middle class had failed to send a single delegate. ... These practical grafters I guessed were too busy doing capitalism. ... quite out of sympathy with these high-minded, anti-capitalist radicals. So what social class are we left with?
"There is, in fact, a name for the group assembled at the Climate rally, though it is rarely used. The protesters were members, or on their way to becoming members, of the New Class. ... not easily defined but may be vaguely described. It consists of a goodly proportion of those college-educated people whose skills and vocations proliferate in a 'post-industrial society' ... We are talking about scientists, teachers and educational administrators, journalists and others in the communication industries, psychologists, social workers, those lawyers and doctors who make their career in the expanding public sector, city planners, the staffs of larger foundations, the upper levels of government bureaucracy and so on. It is by now, a quite numerous class …a disproportionately powerful class, it is also an ambitious and frustrated class. ...
"Members of this class are remarkably conscious of their affinity with other members, they strongly identify with one another politically, culturally and intellectually, and they act, as a class, in a co-ordinated and determined way to pursue their goals. They consider themselves separate from and opposed to other classes. The ideology and worldview of this group, taken as a whole, is consistent, predictable and intractable. And those of us who value individual freedom and property rights, whether we know it or not, are at war with this class. ...
"Th[is] New Class ... has a ‘voracious and insatiable’ hunger for power. ... No other class in history has been as cohesive and single-minded in defending itself and controlling that which it holds. And this includes control of speech and thought. ...
"
As government spending has grown so has the number and size of groups relying directly and indirectly on State funding. These groups, which comprise the core of the New Class, naturally tend to look favourably on their own activities, would like to see their powers increased and their responsibilities extended over greater areas. ...
"The New Class maintains that society needs expert analysis, expert advice, direction, guidance and regulation, and they are the people who will do it. ... They demand more public spending, regulation and planning as naturally as a stream flows down a mountain, because public spending pays their wages and they are the regulators and planners.
"
Members of this class encounter one another, in the workplace and socially, and their views become honed and hammered out. ... and over time they become a coherent, distinct, moral view of the world. ...
"Members of this New Class will always call for something to be done, to solve a perceived problem, in the form of another enquiry or review or committee or institute or ministry, for more research into this or that area, for more laws and statutes and official guidance or the funding of more support groups. If there is no problem to justify an extension of their activities, a problem, or threat, or risk must be found. The problem can never be Big Government (this would be to blame themselves), it must always stem from unregulated activity, and the solution must be more State spending and control.
"To this planning class, freedom itself is an affront. ...
"But grumbling resentment and vague animosity towards the New Class is not enough. The nature of the battle must be spelled out. The need to fight must be underlined, the reasons for waging war explained, and distilled into memorable slogans.
"Most of all, the enemy needs to be clearly identified. Our failure to do so has allowed the New Class to grow and grow, and to escape responsibility for the chaos and misery it has caused. The first step must be to pronounce and advertise, loudly and repeatedly, that the New Class exists. The immense power of the New Class, as we have seen, lies in its anonymity - in the fiction that its members are neutral and disinterested experts, well-meaning ‘concerned’ scientists, high-minded intellectuals, impartial planners and regulators, rationally ordering us and our world, in our best interests. This sham neutrality must be exposed, the selfish motives called out. This invisible class must made visible. This anonymous class must be given a name."
5 comments:
On Jo Nova's blog she has a You Tube clip from Martin Durkin that partially covers your blog extract The Secret Ruling Class
The Establishment (Blob) of the 60s of State and Church is far more extensive.
(Interesting that a Martin Bradbury is a shill for the Blob)
Over at No Minister I have a bunch of posts tagged with Elites, PMC, PME, but it's this quote from Lefty Danyl Mclauchlan in The Spinoff of 2022 that captures it pretty well as he dissected the failure of the Labour government to deliver what they themselves wanted:
In 1994 the US historian and cultural critic Christopher Lasch died, and a year later his final book The Revolt of the Elites was published. Lasch started his career as a socialist and ended it as a hard-to-categorise hybrid of anti-capitalist, anti-consumerist pro-environmental conservative.
The revolting elites in his book are the professional managerial class: the educated technocrats who occupy a commanding position across post-industrial economies, not by direct ownership of capital or overt command of the political system but by managerial control of all our institutions. They run everything.
I’ve written about the professional managerial class [PMC] before – I don’t think you can understand 21st century politics without them – and for Lasch their most important qualities are: a) they’re a global class; b) they’re more concerned with the virtual and abstract than the physical, and, c) the primary purpose of their politics is therapeutic.
Perhaps I should just rename my tag "The Revolting Elites" on NM since it rolls of the tongue better and captures my feelings about them accurately even as I have to acknowledge that I once was one of them for three decades.
Tom, what was it like to be one of them? Was it satisfying? Fulfilling? Happy? Did it generate pride in the activities being undertaken and in the results or consequences achieved? What did it feel like? What was the experience?
I made lots of money that enabled a fun life. :)
Tom, what was the reason you changed?
Post a Comment