Friday 15 December 2023

Javier Milei’s first 100 days ... [updated]

 


If you think the 100-day plan of the new government here is dramatic, then take a chill pill and look across the hemisphere at Argentina.

There, new president Javier Milei has just begun his term with his minister of economy announcing an "emergency package of measures" including, among other things:

  • letting go every government employee who has been employed for less than 1 year
  • appointed government positions are cut by 34%
  • abolishing all government PR and related spending for projects
  •  no more transfers to local government  
  • suspension and cancellation of all public infrastructure (all subject to a lot of corruption in the past)
  • reduction of energy and transport subsidies
  • immediate devaluation of the peso from 350 to 800 pesos per dollar (with a plan towards rapid dollarisation)
  • elimination of all export and import quotas and licences
  • temporary increase in non-agricultural taxes for exports and imports (for uniformity, to the same level of present agricultural taxes)
  • temporary expansion of direct aid through the child benefit and food aid debit card
This, he says, represents cuts to the govt's budget equivalent to over 5% of GDP, that should "completely balance the budget in 2024." The IMF supports the measures.

 Ian Vásquez points out in this guest post below that Milei assumed the presidency of Argentina promising a radical change to the economic and social model that has ruined his country. His challenge is enormous but the new president, he says, has made a politically astute start.

Javier Milei’s Inaugural Promise

by Ian Vásquez

L
ast Sunday Javier Milei assumed the presidency of Argentina promising a radical change to the economic and social model that has ruined his country. His challenge is enormous, but the new president has made a politically astute start.

Unlike what Argentines have become accustomed to from their political leaders, in his inauguration speech Milei treated them as adults. He presented a clear vision. The collectivism into which Argentina long ago headed, he declared, has failed. “For more than 100 years, politicians have insisted on defending a model that only generates poverty, stagnation and misery,” he explained.

He said that it is necessary to return to what made Argentina one of the richest countries in the world more than a century ago: classical liberalism. He again repeated what he meant by using liberal thinker Alberto Benegas Lynch, Jr.’s definition: “Liberalism is the unrestricted respect for the life project of others based on the principle of non‐​aggression and the defense of the right to life, liberty, and private property.” And he made clear that that is “the essence of the new social contract chosen by the Argentines.”

“This new social contract,” added Milei, “proposes a different country, a country in which the state does not direct our lives, but rather safeguards our rights.” In practice, he proposed nothing less than undoing the corporatist legacy of Peronism that has led the country from crisis to crisis and replacing it with institutions and policies that limit political power.

Milei was brutally honest about the difficulties facing the country. “I prefer to tell you an uncomfortable truth rather than a comfortable lie.” He described the legacy left by the outgoing government and that, as a result, economic activity, poverty, wages, and unemployment will get markedly worse before they get better. The fiscal deficit is around 15 percent of GDP; the monetary emission of the previous government will continue to create inflation for 18 to 24 months with the potential to reach up to 15,000 percent annually if things stay on the same path; the public debt has reached $100 billion; there is a lack of access to foreign markets; poverty afflicts 45 percent of the population and indigence 10 percent. The new president also described the calamitous conditions in which public security, education, and infrastructure find themselves.

For these and other reasons, it was not an exaggeration for the Argentine daily La Nación to declare that the outgoing president has been the worst in Argentine history. That is also why Milei explained there is no alternative to a strong adjustment: quite simply, “there is no money.” The priority will be fiscal adjustment and Argentines do not have the luxury to implement gradual reform.

Citing Argentine history, Milei showed that gradualism does not work. He could have cited the European post‐​communist experience as well, as countries that reformed quickly and in a coherent manner grew at higher rates and achieved lower inflation, greater levels of foreign investment, and the development of stronger institutions.


Also unlike past experience, the coming adjustment, Milei clarified, will fall almost entirely on the state and not on the private sector. Cleaning up public accounts in such a way is consistent with the most successful international practices and with Milei’s liberal vision. As the former professor rightly insisted, “the only way out of poverty is with more freedom.”

In the days and weeks to come, we will have more details about how the new government proposes to get out of the hole in which the country finds itself. Just this week, on Wednesday, the new finance minister announced a series of emergency measures including cuts to energy and transportation subsidies, an end to new infrastructure spending, a devaluation of the official exchange rate of about 50 percent, and a reduction in federal transfers to the provinces -- among other measures that, by and large, point the country in the right direction. The economic pain will be deep. [See above for a partial list of the emergency measures.]

There is no doubt that Milei will face political resistance from the Peronists and their allies, and that the challenge will be even greater given the new leader’s lack of a majority in Congress. But Milei has a popular mandate to bring about a paradigm shift and, as the crisis worsens, he is counting on the people to continue to understand who should be held responsible for Argentina’s mess.

* * * * 

Ian Vásquez is vice president for international studies at the Cato Institute and director of its Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity. He is a weekly columnist at El Comercio(Peru), and his articles have appeared in newspapers throughout the United States and Latin America.
    Vásquez has appeared on CNBC, NBC, C‑SPAN, CNN, Telemundo, Univisión, and Canadian Television, as well as NPR and Voice of America, discussing foreign policy and development issues.
    He received his bachelor’s degree from Northwestern University and his master’s degree from the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University. He is the coauthor of the Human Freedom Index, editor of Global Fortune: The Stumble and Rise of World Capitalism, and coeditor of Perpetuating Poverty: The World Bank, the IMF and the Developing World. He has testified numerous times in the U.S. Congress on economic development issues.
    Vásquez has been a term member of the US Council on Foreign Relations and is a member of the Mont Pèlerin Society.
    This article is based on a version that was originally published in El Comercio (Peru) on December 11, 2023, then at the Cato at Liberty blog.

RELATED:

1 comment:

MarkT said...

Go that man.