"Academics, journalists and politicians bemoan every three years how little interest there is in the local body elections in New Zealand. The narrative being that if more people voted, then local government would be "better" and people being more "engaged" would result in bette Councillors, better decisions, better cities, towns and districts.
"It's utter nonsense....
"Local government has little to do with many issues, such as healthcare, education, justice, policing, but it DOES have a lot to do with areas that are in crisis, such as water ... housing ... supermarket competition.
"Local government also attracts a particular type of person. More often than not it attracts busybodies, planners, pushy finger-wagging types who think they know what's best, over what people actually indicate according to their willingness to pay....
"So vote if you must, but the real problem is that local government has too much power.... So pick candidates who want to get out of the way, of new housing, of new supermarkets, of enterprise and don't want to promise grand totemic projects that you have to pay for.... Maybe pick those who actually have some understanding of the limits of the ability of local government."~ Liberty Scott, from his post 'Which wannabe busybodies do you want on your council?'
1 comment:
I’ve got some confidence the current favourite for Christchurch mayor would be a refreshing change to this norm, not primarily because he’s saying the right things generally (even though he is), but because of past actions such as this.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/124540232/christchurch-councillor-fined-300-for-digging-unauthorised-trench
Post a Comment