Wednesday, 11 January 2017

Cold weather kills

 

Nature is not naturally benevolent. We have to work to make it so, for us. The point of human production – the reason we get up in the morning and go to work, if we can – is to make our lives better. If human life is our standard, then making human lives better and the natural environment more humane is a good thing.

So when you see dozens killed by Europe's coldest weather in years you may realise that cold weather kills – kills vastly more than warmer weather does – and that human production that makes the human environment warmer may not be a totally bad thing. And, therefore, that the fossil fuels people burn to stay warm are not a bad thing.

“Most of the Northern Hemisphere is now in the throes of the deadliest time of the year [writes Jane Brody in the ‘New York Times’]. Cold kills, and I don’t mean just extreme cold and crippling blizzards. I mean ordinary winter cold, like that typically experienced, chronically or episodically, by people in every state but Hawaii from late fall through early spring.
    While casualties resulting from heat waves receive wide publicity, deaths from bouts of extreme cold rarely do, and those resulting from ordinary winter weather warrant virtually no attention. Yet an international study covering 384 locations in 13 countries, including the United States, found that cold weather is responsible, directly or indirectly, for 17 times as many deaths as hot weather.

Cold weather kills vastly more than warmer weather does. Think about that.

According to Alex Epstein: “Fossil Fuels don’t take a safe climate and make it dangerous, they take a dangerous climate and make it safe.” So as the northern hemisphere is in the grip  of its deadliest time of year he asks of those afflicted,

How habitable is the world outside your door right now? Are fossil fuels keeping you safe from the climate, or are they making the climate dangerous for you? Is it time to re-evaluate our relationship with the fossil fuels and our environment?

Is it?

.

1 comment:

  1. To play Devil's Advocate a bit, no global warming alarmist that I've encountered has argued that temperatures directly cause problems. The argument is that higher temperatures shift climate in ways that could cause higher death rates, such as increasing storm frequency and/or severity in certain areas, decreasing rainfall in others, changing when in the year rainfall occurs, etc. The temperature is used as a proxy, because they believe in a causal connection between temperature and those factors above.

    Not one has explained how life survived before the present ice age, of course, nor have any that I have encountered acknowledged the fact (evident from ANY paleocolimatological data) that what they consider normal is absurdly frigid for the Cenozoic, nor have they addressed the fact that NONE of their doom-and-gloom predictions occurred at OIS 11...

    ReplyDelete

1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.