Thursday, 6 October 2016

Headmistress May declares immigrants and libertarians the enemy


“Come with me and let’s seize the day,” UK PM Theresa May told an adoring Conservative Party conference overnight. But libertarians, foreigners? We can all can piss off.

It was unclear from the get go how a Remainer and not-so-closet authoritarian would handle the opportunities of Brexit. Would she plump for freedom and opening up Britain to the world? Or become a “Little Briton” and hunker down instinctively in her statist bunker. From the conference presentations, it looks like the latter: her Home Secretary telling the conference foreigners are taking British jobs and must be stopped (“Don’t call me racist, but …”) – a “sharp line of distinction” perhaps being drawn between true natives and those simply working there?; May herself declaring “it's not racist to worry about immigrants” (prompting wits to suggest It's not racist to worry about immigration' is the new 'I'm not racist but..'); and the hundreds-of-thousands in her party and across the land who subscribe to freer markets, smaller govt and lighter taxes were told their day is done. Get used to it.

Her enemy, she says explicitly, is the “libertarian right”:

_Quote2Government can and should be a force for good [says Mrs May]; the state exists to provide what individual people, communities and markets cannot; we should employ the power of government for the good of the people. Time to reject the ideological templates provided by the socialist left and the libertarian right and embrace a new centre ground in which government steps up – and not back – to act on behalf of the people.

Hers will be an “interventionist Conservative government,” she says, acting “on behalf of the people.” A populist interventionist statist then oblivious even to facts – the fact for instance that “British workers already have British jobs. The employment rate for UK nationals is the highest since at least '97 (as far back as data goes)”:


Guido Fawkes responds forcefully to May’s garbage populism, pointing out that “claiming to reject ideology is nonsense”:

May is advocating an ideology of “centrism”, statist, intervening in the economy, acceptance of perpetual borrowing and over-spending, coupled with greater intrusion by the state into the lives of individuals. Remember her Snoopers’ Charter, giving the state powers to intercept personal online data of every individual. Her conference speech last year, lest we forget, was panned by the Institute of Directors and described as “chilling and bitter”. May, whilst claiming the state is a “force for good,” is proposing to force companies to list foreign workers, an ominous and pointless intervention in the private contracts of business. She will also hint this afternoon at imposing price controls on energy companies, another interventionist policy for which the Tories rightly monstered Ed Miliband. Thatcher wanted to “roll back the frontiers of the state”. May wants “government to step up, not back.

As Christopher Snowdon points out, this anti-liberty streak is very much Conservative, her predecessor David Cameron having told the 2008 conference that “freedom can easily turn into the idea that we all have the right to do whatever we want, regardless of trhe effect on others. That is libertarian, not Conservative – and it is certainly not me.”

He got that much right.

So there were hopes after Brexit that Britain might open itself up to the world, note necessarily completelyt opening its non-European borders but at least perhaps (re)joining the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), kicking off a Commonwealth Free Trade organisation, and even, as ACT’s David Seymour suggests, announcing a "free movement" agreement with Britain that could include the likes of Canada, Australia and the NZ …

… "Britain's revision of immigration settings is a chance to propose a free movement zone similar to what we have with Australia," said [Seymour] on Wednesday. "In the long term we could even negotiate a broader zone for citizens of Britain, New Zealand, Australia and Canada - CANZUK."

After May’s declaration however, any part of those dreams looks like the boldest kind of fantasy.

[Hat tip Terry Barnes, Sarah O'Connor, Christopher Snowdon ,,, and Private Eye for the Headmistress jab]


  1. Mother Theresa it seems, like most politicians, believes that she is gifted with special wisdom and foresight and knows exactly what is best for her subjects and is quite prepared to use "force" to effect her desired outcomes . Too bad about our own individual freedoms, ambitions and desires. Same old political bulldust.

  2. Nationalism in Britain
    ." This Government will not waver in its commitment to put the interest of the British people first ."
    Almost impossible to disagree with. In fact it would be better if her speech podium read
    " A Country that works for all British people " or something like that.

    If she can get the idea of preferential and restricted immigration she will be PM for a long time.
    Libertarianism is going to take the same pounding in the next decade that Social Conservatism has taken for generations. When I tell people that Libertarians place no value on sovereignty they blink first and then start up. Your ideals are lost in the times of reality.
    Sovereignty is now the new private property.. Too glib? Well it is true. Wait and watch.
    I would take a bet that British trade recovers within a few short years as the Juncker Empire collapses further under is own weight and people see what Britain is doing.
    It may well be that a few Libertarians need to be tortured for the greater good.
    A little suffering and exercises in humility.

    May has smelled actuality. This sense of Nationhood is spreading through Europe and the world.
    You have seen the collapse into meaninglessness of the grey liberal Turnbull Government in Australia.
    The Senate is a social revolution and will see the end of him.
    In New Zealand next year NZ First will gain 14% votes. There will be turmoil hera as well, gnashing of rabbits teeth, within the borderless open range of dreams.

    1. Adolf Hitler was into Nationalism. Putting the interests of the British people first, is like a shepherd and his dogs putting his flock first.The nine most terrifying words in the English language,"I'm from the gov't and I'm here to help". Ronald Reagan.
      Libertarianism , individual freedom, is already taking a pounding. Without individual freedom we are just like the sheep, to be managed as the shepherd sees fit.We take our individual freedoms for granted at our own peril.
      " I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered. My life is my own. Patrick Mcgoohan Prisoner.


1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.