Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Unitary Plan: The planners strike back*

 

RMA-web

The many-mirrored maze through which Auckland’s proposed Unitary Plan is finally decided upon – the plan through which planners gain detailed control of your property – lurches closer towards resolution.

When it came out of the Independent Hearings Panel, it was much less then this common-law loving blogger would have liked, but far better than anyone with my sympathies could have expected. And then it went on to the planners for them to tinker with it again. And the planners have struck back!

Not for them to sit back while some Independent Panel of geeks knocks some of their new power-base form under them.  Their recommendations to council, reviewing those of the Panel, put back in many of the more intrusive things the Panel recommended leaving out.

Of the Panel’s headline recommendations, I found one bad, one very bad, three good, one mostly good, and one very good. That’s not bad. But what is bad is what the planners have done now.

What I was calling very good news is now gone – the Taniwha Tax is back. So that’s now very bad.

They’ve essentially put the kibosh on any ambitions Aucklanders may have for Tiny Houses, those often cunningly crafted wee places folk are falling into overseas as a means to get into a city economically. Nah, say our planners. Not welcome here. We are going to insist on “minimum dwelling sizes” in our city. Fuck you, planners. Fuck you very much. Very bad news.

The planners want to strengthen the city’s ring-fence – what they call the rural-urban boundary – the thing that delivers land-bankers risk-free profits and guarantees future carpet sprawl. That thing. They insist we keep it. More very bad news.

There is more, and it’s massive, and none of the news is good.

The Council themselves are expected to vote on this final 618-page set of recommendations next week. Goog luck with that.

And good luck with knowing what the final outcome is going to be. It’s going to be a bunfest, that’s about all we do know.

And this bunfest has been going on now for years.

So if you’ve found yourself wondering why many empty sites around town are still empty, one answer is probably this: Regime Uncertainty. If you’re uncertain what decrees the regime in power is going to issue, then any wise investor ready to unleash his supply chain is going to sit on his hands until he knows what’s up. And he’s going to do that, even if folk are crying out even when supplies are running short …

[* Thanks to Toby  Manhire for the quip]

.*

2 comments:

  1. Taniwha tax, appointments and privilege
    I think it is too late by far, to hope for any equality of representation , and refusal of race based appointments and privilege from Councils or Government .
    What will happen in New Zealand, must happen, because racial privilege and stealthy affirmation is not equality.
    We will have the revolution at the ballot box, and there will be fury.
    I sent the full opinion to Brash, and repeat here similar as necessary.

    That is, we will find a charismatic, preferably male, who is good looking, nice wife, no drugs, sharp mind. And a person absolutely determined to see the end of race based social leverage, over this country.
    We are looking for Nigel Farage type, preferably in Maori skin, and some people still think we have him.
    But it doesn’t work. Winston and NZF may take 15% votes, but Farage spent about twenty years,
    and Winston does not have that time or single minded purpose.
    Our Government is a disgrace. It has such following yet it is a cardboard cut out Government, a wet and soggy cardboard Nanny.
    None of this would have happened if they had allowed Brash to continue leadership, but we found that our sloppy white people here, have the liberal pansy sickness as well.
    They voted him up and dragged him down. No, its a Farage we have to find, and soon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The council's reaction to the unitary plan is not unexpected. The housing shambles will continue for years hindering progress and growth in Auckland at a great cost not just to the rate payer but also the tax payer.

    ReplyDelete

1. Commenters are welcome and invited.
2. All comments are moderated. Off-topic grandstanding, spam, and gibberish will be ignored. Tu quoque will be moderated.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say, it's important enough to put a name to.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.