Monday, 27 July 2015

Yes, euthanasia is already happening in NZ

Everyone who’s ever watched someone they love dying already knows this, and will have their own story about it to tell …

Euthanasia is already happening in NZ
Doctors and nurses are playing increasing roles in prescribing, supplying or administering drugs that may hasten a patient’s death, according to new research.
A University of Auckland study anonymously surveyed 650 GPs.
Sixteen reported prescribing, supplying or administering a drug with the explicit intention of bringing death about more quickly.
But in 15 of those cases, it was nurses who administered the drugs. 
Researchers acknowledged the actions of the GPs would generally be understood as euthanasia, but the survey did not use that term. 
In the survey, led by Auckland University senior lecturer Dr Phillipa Malpas, GPs were asked about the last death at which they were the attending doctor.
Of the 650 to respond, 359 (65.6 per cent) reported that they had made decisions, such as withdrawing treatment or alleviating pain, taking into account the probability that they may hasten death.
Some made explicit decisions about hastening death.
Of the 359, 16.2 per cent withheld treatments with the “explicit purpose of not prolonging life or hastening the end of life”.

I agree with David Farrar: “So euthanasia is already quite widespread – but with no legal protections for patients. If we legalise euthanasia, then we put in place a legal process where we can be sure any actions taken are with the consent of the patient, and is necessary to stop their suffering.”  And also so that friends and loved ones and everyone involved may have a candid conversation about the ending of a life, instead of furtive hints about what medication might be expected to do or not to do.

1 comment:

  1. There is no evidence that doctors are carrying out mass murder so I still wonder whether this casual, quiet, common sense approach without punishment (if you can resist needing to tell someone or write a book about it) is better than a law which may prove to be another RMA. If you hate government interference wanting new law on something as intensely personal as this seems to be asking for more trouble.



1. Comments are welcome and encouraged.
2. Comments are moderated. Gibberish, spam & off-topic grandstanding will be removed. Tu quoque will be moderated. Links to bogus news sites (and worse) will be deleted.
3. Read the post before you comment. Challenge facts, but don't simply ignore them.
4. Use a name. If it's important enough to say it, it's important enough to put a name to it.
5. Above all: Act with honour. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.