Peter Schiff talks about the impact and arguments of former Reagan Budget Director David Stockman, and his new book The Great Deformation: Corruption of Capitalism in America. Because it was written by a former insider, it’s been making waves, Stockman’s critics “shooting the messenger” rather than dealing with his severe criticisms …
In reference to an op-ed piece by Stockman in the New York Times, for example, “Corruption of Capitalism in America,” Krugman dismissed the ex-congressman as a "cranky old man" without even reading the book.
Actually, I was disappointed in Stockman’s piece. I thought there would be some kind of real argument, some presentation, however tendentious, of evidence. Instead it’s just a series of gee-whiz, context- and model-free numbers embedded in a rant — and not even an interesting rant. It’s cranky old man stuff…
3 comments:
"Because it was written by a former insider, it’s been making waves, shooting the messenger rather than dealing with the arguments…"
you mean the critics of Stockman are shooting Stockman? or Stockman is shooting a messenger?
Sorry, it was a little poorly written, wasn't it.
no ...i wasnt being pedantic, it was a serious question.
(call me slow on the uptake) but I presume the messenger being shot is Stockman?
Post a Comment