Time to overturn the anti-smacking law
MacDoctor makes much sense on Jimmy Mason’s conviction for punching his four-year-old in the face – a crime that was illegal before Sure Bradford and is still illegal now. As such, as MacDoctor says, “It is not even remotely a test case for the new legislation.”
This is not to say at that the Bradford/Clark/Key anti-smacking law should “trundle along unattended to, on the grounds that [we] are not seeing large numbers of convictions under the new law. This is a dangerous illusion. The damage is being done to thousands of toddlers as I type.”
This is the damage to children of receiving no discipline at all – since under the fear, uncertainty and doubt of brought in by the new anti-smacking regime, no parent now knows what the hell they’re legally allowed to do with their own children. The resulting horror stories of good parents being hounded for administering a light tap and other parents simply giving up on any parental discipline whatsoever is frankly “far worse for children than the inappropriate punch of Jimmy Mason.”
MacDoctor makes a good argument for reinstating the legal protection of Section 59 immediately. Read Not Smacking and see if you can disagree.