Friday, May 29, 2009

“Entitlements” and moral inversion

There was one word I kept hearing over and over yesterday.  That word was “entitlement” or, occasionally in the plural, “entitlements” – as in “I’m not going to cut people’s entitlements, but I’m sure as shooting not going to cut people’s taxes either.”

“Entitlements”?  Really?  Is that the most accurate way to describe hand-outs to moochers?  To describe largesse forcibly extracted from the taxpayer?  As an entitlement?

We have entered strange times. 

While the wealth of producers is stolen to pay for these handouts – while their property is considered fair game – the handouts themselves are now considered the property of the moochers. As somehow untouchable.

It is a strange and destructive moral inversion.

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

Blogger Lindsay said...

Ain't that the truth.

There is an interesting description of the welfare state transforming from being 'morality' based in the post war years (hence recipient numbers stayed low) into being 'rights-based' from the 60s (and numbers soared).

Even libertarians would prefer the former to what we have now.

5/29/2009 11:17:00 am  
Anonymous Richard McGrath said...

As I think you have suggested in the past, Lindsay, the welfare state has undermined morality as such. Little wonder we appear to have a growing subculture of amoral sociopaths with a sneering hatred of productive people.

5/29/2009 12:02:00 pm  
Blogger Lucyna Maria said...

PC, totally agree.

5/29/2009 02:49:00 pm  
Anonymous Falafulu Fisi said...

Jim Donovan brought up the same issue regarding entitlements on his blog too :

Government spending and a sense of entitlement

5/31/2009 12:13:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

Links to this post:

<< Home