Thursday, June 29, 2006

The Goverment is not above the law

Yes, Labour stole the election -- knowingly over-spending the legal limit by nearly half-a-million dollars, after being told by the electoral commission that their 'pledge cards,' the reason for the over-spend, would be included in their election spending.

They didn't care. They went ahead anyway, funding the pledge cards with your money. They bought the election with money they weren't allowed to spend. Not for the first time, they thought they were above the law.

They're not. And now, something is being done about it.

Libertarianz leader Bernard Darnton has filed suit in the High Court:

The lawsuit claims that the use of the parliamentary leader's fund to pay for the pledge card and brochure breached the Constitution Act 1986, the Public Finance Act 1989, and the Bill of Rights 1688. Darnton is calling for the High Court to make a declaration that this expenditure was illegal.

“Helen Clark is not above the law,” Darnton said. “This time she's not going to get away with it.”

“The rules on Crown spending are very clear. All Crown spending must be authorised by Parliament. Each year Parliament must pass an Appropriations Act that details how much the Crown may spend and what it may spend it on. The money spent on the pledge cards was appropriated for the running of the leader's office. This rules for this money explicitly exclude “party political, promotional or electioneering material”. It was not appropriated for election advertising and thus the spending was illegal.

“This government seems to have forgotten who's in charge. In a democracy, the people are in charge. The people elect a Parliament and then parliamentarians form a government. The government is the servant of the people, not their master. The appropriations rules are one of our basic constitutional protections. By ignoring the appropriations rules, this government has shown that it doesn't care about the will of Parliament or the will of the people and is quite happy to behave like a dictatorship.

“A declaration by the High Court that this spending was illegal will send a clear reminder to the Clark regime that they are not above the law and that they are still answerable to their master, the public.

“I'm absolutely committed to making sure that this government doesn't get away with breaking the law. A government that follows the rule of law is essential to a free and open society. Something is rotten in the state of New Zealand, and my pledge is to stop the rot.”

You can find out details of what Labour did and what's being done about it in the new and re-launched The Free Radical (pictured above), which is out early next week, bigger and better than ever before. Subscribe now, or order your copy from your newsagent to make sure you don't miss out.

And you can keep up to date with proceedings at the trial website: www.DarntonVsClark.org.

This promises to be very interesting. Very interesting indeed.

TAGS: Politics-NZ, Politics-Labour, Libz, Darnton V Clark

Labels: , , , , , ,

5 Comments:

Blogger Duncan Bayne said...

Just when I was starting to despair at the state of politics in New Zealand ... bloody good show Bernard, bloody good show!

6/29/2006 05:43:00 pm  
Blogger KG said...

bloody good show all right--but why haven't National already done the same??brwxn

6/29/2006 06:19:00 pm  
Anonymous george said...

Wayleggo Bernard!

Pass the hat around someone.

6/29/2006 09:56:00 pm  
Blogger Southern Gent said...

kg said "why not National?"
Because they are trying to keep there head down for their own overspending!

Why not Act? or the others in Parliament? Because they do not have principles either! Theyt are all on the gravey train.

Well done Bernie's Band of Merry Men :)

6/30/2006 09:32:00 am  
Anonymous Marie said...

I Have a comment,, there is a lot of things that the goverment can get money off instead of taking it from the needy, football players , actors, those who earn crazy money and use it for drugs , cause they have far too much to know what to do with it.and the banks promised to give back to small companys but didnt , they should be pulled up and have to pay back .its not fair that the unemployed, or less well off be degraded more by being taxed , are we not taxed enough.

9/06/2009 12:00:00 am  

Post a Comment

Respond with a polite and intelligent comment. (Both will be applauded.)

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. (Do others the courtesy of being honest.)

Please put a name to your comments. (If you're prepared to give voice, then back it up with a name.)

And don't troll. Please. (Contemplate doing something more productive with your time, and ours.)

<< Home