On Wednesday, the ACT Party posted a pictorial illustrating how over-regulated we are. To which the redoubtable Michael Reddell asked the obvious question:
How many regulatory bodies have been closed down, or substantially hacked back, in the first 2.5 years of this government?
No answer. So he asked again:
How many of the 267+ regulators had been abolished or substantially hacked back under the current govt, 2.5yrs in?
He's still asking.
So here's a question for you: what value is a government who promises to do this term what they promised to do last term, but didn't.
Would that meet the definition of "trustworthy"?

No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome thoughtful disagreement.
But we do (ir)regularly moderate comments -- and we *will* delete any with insulting or abusive language. Or if they're just inane or off topic. It’s okay to disagree, but pretend you’re having a drink in the living room with the person you’re disagreeing with. This includes me.
PS: Have the honesty and courage to use your real name. That gives added weight to any opinion.