tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post6030864903663851607..comments2024-03-29T10:51:27.752+13:00Comments on Not PC: Referendum: Can’t vote, won’t votePeter Cresswellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-74403283429179345672013-11-28T18:55:02.549+13:002013-11-28T18:55:02.549+13:00Craig
No. That debt was acquired by those who mad...Craig<br /><br />No. That debt was acquired by those who made the decision to run it up. That they claim to have done it in the name of others does not make any other persons liable. Making the victims of theft responsible for paying off the debts of the theives who stole from them victimise double! That is not right.<br /><br />Amit<br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-56081077078673007252013-11-27T21:57:34.666+13:002013-11-27T21:57:34.666+13:00Amit, unfortunately if you want to allocate out go...Amit, unfortunately if you want to allocate out government assets freely to taxpayers you will have to do the same with government debt.Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17939162327111283194noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-64575458455211117622013-11-27T20:22:18.733+13:002013-11-27T20:22:18.733+13:00You people are all wrong. The only way these outfi...You people are all wrong. The only way these outfits can morally be returned to the public is to allocate shares to those who paid the taxes that built them. The shares ought not to be charged for but handed over free of charge. Putting shares on the market and expecting people to pay for them (effectively paying a second time) is analogous to conversion of stolen property. That is not right. The thieves must not benefit from this transaction. Give the property back free of encumberances to those who paid for it already.<br /><br />Amit Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-2998031790667409682013-11-26T20:07:25.043+13:002013-11-26T20:07:25.043+13:00Our local Green man has
13 reasons why you should ...Our local Green man has<br /><a href="http://www.localbodies-bsprout.blogspot.co.nz/2013/11/12-reasons-for-voting-no.html" rel="nofollow">13 reasons why you should vote against</a><br /><br />Of course, it must be 100%.Shane Pleasancehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06144367923437327037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-12918206771479327512013-11-26T15:50:07.182+13:002013-11-26T15:50:07.182+13:00Whilst I agree with you that government should not...Whilst I agree with you that government should not be running businesses and should sell off 100% of these and other assets, the referendum is not about that. It's about politics. <br /><br />That's why I'll be voting yes. To tell Cunliffe, Norman and their fellow travelers to go take a hike. Just like the public voted against Winston in the superannuation referendum, it would be good to 'send them a message'.Paranormalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09356284718669009511noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-48561015784461548152013-11-26T11:28:26.797+13:002013-11-26T11:28:26.797+13:00I'd be happy for them to sell more too. The wh...I'd be happy for them to sell more too. The whole thing is an expensive exercise in futility - nothing more than self-promotion for the opposition.homepaddockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08596903968235369282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-37700273201116575262013-11-26T11:21:38.039+13:002013-11-26T11:21:38.039+13:00“No I don’t, because I support the Government sell... “No I don’t, because I support the Government selling off 100%…”<br /><br />Ditto. Which is the main reason it has just landed in the 'recycling' bin.:-)ngapakihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00331281363810561218noreply@blogger.com