"So what is the real reason for the change [to not require DPB recipients to name the father]? It's the imposition of radical feminism whereby women's [alleged] rights are elevated above children's .... with the added bonus of screwing the taxpayer."
~ Lindsay Mitchell, from her post 'The ghost of Metiria and more lies'
.
▼
Wednesday, 15 November 2017
Quote of the Day: On the real reason not to require DPB recipients to name the father
2 comments:
We welcome thoughtful disagreement.
But we do (ir)regularly moderate comments -- and we *will* delete any with insulting or abusive language. Or if they're just inane or off topic. It’s okay to disagree, but pretend you’re having a drink in the living room with the person you’re disagreeing with. This includes me.
PS: Have the honesty and courage to use your real name. That gives added weight to any opinion.
I am just going through a prolonged period of suffering [ cancelled Superannuation ] for saying that MSD Review cabal are a bunch of pig headed feminazis and that Brendan Boyle [CEO] is a law unto himself sociopath. [ For good reasons > they are feminazis and BB a sociopath >> opinion solely that of paul scott ] That makes me obnoxious and I can now be discriminated against at all levels within the State. This is your little citizens file spills over to INZ, Police, DIA, Everywhere . Its big penalty when you cross the feminazi. Just about anyone can get hold of my bad boy file, but not me because its private and I might be offended.
ReplyDeleteThere will be votes for Labour in it somewhere.
ReplyDelete