Why Tim? If he's right to oppose anti discrimination laws in the sphere of commerce (prohibiting a prohibition on negroes at the lunch counter for example) he's right. Unless he's ashamed of his position and needs to hide behind weasel words and ummmm evasion.
We welcome thoughtful disagreement. But we do (ir)regularly moderate comments -- and we *will* delete any with insulting or abusive language. Or if they're just inane or off topic. It’s okay to disagree, but pretend you’re having a drink in the living room with the person you’re disagreeing with. This includes me. PS: Have the honesty and courage to use your real name. That gives added weight to any opinion.
This is fantastic. Completely agree.
ReplyDeleteDiscrimination has become a dysphemism for choice and ironically enough, choice has become a euphemism for coercion (antitrust, for example)
Excellent. Completely agree. Paul should've known better than to get tangled up in it though ..
ReplyDeleteWhy Tim? If he's right to oppose anti discrimination laws in the sphere of commerce (prohibiting a prohibition on negroes at the lunch counter for example) he's right. Unless he's ashamed of his position and needs to hide behind weasel words and ummmm evasion.
ReplyDeleteJudge Holden