. . . promoting capitalist acts between consenting adults.
▼
Monday, 29 August 2005
When abolishing racism is racism
Can someone tell me how exactly "abolishing the [Maori] seats would... hurt social cohesion in New Zealand," or is the Greens Frog Blog (sorry, frog blog) talking: a) "the politics of racial divisiveness" b) racist nonsense c) gibberish d) spin.
The usual post-modernist claptrap that classifies people into groups, some oppressed, some not, and justifies any special use of other people's money, or regulating other people's lives or property - for the sake of the so-called oppressed group.
How do these people cope with Maori who are wealthy through private enterprise? How do the Greens cope with looking at people and not judging them by race?
We welcome thoughtful disagreement. But we do (ir)regularly moderate comments -- and we *will* delete any with insulting or abusive language. Or if they're just inane or off topic. It’s okay to disagree, but pretend you’re having a drink in the living room with the person you’re disagreeing with. This includes me. PS: Have the honesty and courage to use your real name. That gives added weight to any opinion.
The usual post-modernist claptrap that classifies people into groups, some oppressed, some not, and justifies any special use of other people's money, or regulating other people's lives or property - for the sake of the so-called oppressed group.
ReplyDeleteHow do these people cope with Maori who are wealthy through private enterprise? How do the Greens cope with looking at people and not judging them by race?
Yes, how are people classified into groups! Gee, hmmm... that's a hum-dinger, that!
ReplyDelete