tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post8887791562127813002..comments2024-03-29T10:51:27.752+13:00Comments on Not PC: EVENT: "The real goal of the green climate crusade"Peter Cresswellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-78935890055513794072012-04-20T09:12:06.032+12:002012-04-20T09:12:06.032+12:00You've got the propaganda wrong gazzamuso. It&...You've got the propaganda wrong gazzamuso. It's supposed to be 97% of scientists, not 95% - did you misread your eco-loon memo?<br /><br />Do you know where the 97% figure comes from?<br /><br />A University of Illinois survey in which thousands of scientists were surveyed and sadly for the researchers very few responded so they culled the survey down to only "earth scientists" (you know not real ones) and 70 - 80 of their responses. The question they asked was, "Do you think humans have an effect on the climate", which everyone knows we do, whether it be the heat island effect or the SMALL effect CO2 has on the greenhouse effect. That 100% didn't respond "yes" tells you everything you need to know about "earth scientists".<br /><br />Back to eco re-orientation camp for you.Jeremy Harrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05819630707494648769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-85200418712953001902012-04-20T09:11:45.563+12:002012-04-20T09:11:45.563+12:00@Gazzumuso, you said: "Environmentalists cons...@Gazzumuso, you said: "Environmentalists constantly promote wind and solar power."<br /><br />Yes, they promote them in the abstract, and opposes every real-life application of them. (I give you, for example, Project Hayes.)<br /><br />And the reason they're promoted at all? Because as industrial-scale power producers neither solar nor wind are either reliable enough now capable of the capacity. In other words, they're not real alternatives, and insofar as they require subsidies they actually waste resources rather than save them.<br /><br />"Surely it's more plausible that rich oil companies are bribing a few scientists and corrupt news networks to push anti climate change propaganda."<br /><br />Really? You have evidence of this well-funded conspiracy?Peter Cresswellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1651687554508819632012-04-19T18:20:28.993+12:002012-04-19T18:20:28.993+12:00lol, you've got to be joking. Environmentalist...lol, you've got to be joking. Environmentalists constantly promote wind and solar power. Also, do you really think that at least 95% of the world's scientists, along with low budget community groups are colluding to bring down the economy? Surely it's more plausible that rich oil companies are bribing a few scientists and corrupt news networks to push anti climate change propaganda. You only have to follow the money trail, any idiot can see that. For goodness sake...gazzamusohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01981474743845730243noreply@blogger.com