tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post4241538268024158973..comments2024-03-30T00:09:27.602+13:00Comments on Not PC: Philosophy of Global WarmingPeter Cresswellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-29119972545217169682007-05-11T09:43:00.000+12:002007-05-11T09:43:00.000+12:00Yeah well, its hardly suprising in a day and age w...Yeah well, its hardly suprising in a day and age when more and more scientists beleive some of the obviously nonsensical theories in Quantum Mechanics (like the latest claim that either reality (and not just subatomic particles this time) mustnt exist when not looked at or that seperated particles can have instant effects on each other) that they will be champions of a mystical cult of warming.<BR/><BR/>Ive been saying it for a while now, and im being proven correct all the time: Scientists NEED philosophy to help them keep mysiticsm like certain theories in QM and this Global Warming Spaghetti Monster out of it.<BR/><BR/>Science ISNT just a means of devising a model that seems to describe a presumed model reality that they dont chcek for consitency, its meant to MATCH reality, describe it.<BR/><BR/>Science is a means of identifiying how reality works..but before you do that you need philosophy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-29493734452006767182007-05-11T09:42:00.000+12:002007-05-11T09:42:00.000+12:00This comment has been removed by the author.Dwayne Davieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00980405171642038256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-47890679130457259672007-05-09T17:43:00.000+12:002007-05-09T17:43:00.000+12:00Ahem - I think you'd find it difficult to convince...Ahem - I think you'd find it difficult to convince a scientist that the questions <I>"Is warming happening?"</I> and <I>"What's the agent of change?"</I> are <B>meta</B>-physical.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com