tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post3188302065515728220..comments2024-03-30T00:09:27.602+13:00Comments on Not PC: Housing: Variety through repetitionPeter Cresswellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-24547634181101889742017-02-25T14:56:21.208+13:002017-02-25T14:56:21.208+13:00On the face of it seems a great way to get the eco...On the face of it seems a great way to get the economy that comes with repetition, and still some variety - so very interested in this. The only proviso being the land needs to be relatively cheap and plentiful. If you try and apply it to a rectangular urban lot of medium or high density where land values aren't low, any difference in orientation will generally mean less units and therefore drive up the unit cost. Is this a theoretical study or a live project that might be built?MarkThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06199883270652041621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-83989594155907254982017-02-24T22:08:11.639+13:002017-02-24T22:08:11.639+13:00I like the design. And the variety. And economical...I like the design. And the variety. And economical. But I'd go for something smaller and simpler.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-75222076893263510582017-02-24T10:22:48.543+13:002017-02-24T10:22:48.543+13:00No. I like my 1 acre section in the subhurbs too ...No. I like my 1 acre section in the subhurbs too much although the house design in isolation is appealing. I also have a dislike for flat roofing.<br /><br />3:16Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com