tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post2253609871499565292..comments2024-03-18T17:17:00.423+13:00Comments on Not PC: “Global warming is not a crisis, but it may be creating a crisis of intellectual integrity” [update 3]Peter Cresswellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-35953169386610867262009-03-05T17:31:00.000+13:002009-03-05T17:31:00.000+13:00Key KNOWS that this global warming/ climate change...Key KNOWS that this global warming/ climate change stuff is false. He's been on the record and stated that he didn't believe in it on previous occasions. But once he got firmly into politics he changed direction. Once the "advisors" and all thise sundry national socialist hangers-on got through with him he flip-flopped (not the first time he's done that). It seems the guy lacks integrity. Certainly spineless. <BR/><BR/>So where are all those National Party supporters now? You remember them? Remember the ones making all the big noises about being pragmatic and the like; saying that supportuing Libertarianz was a wasted vote or saying that not voting was a waste. Vote National as there was no other choice... It's looking very hollow now, isn't it just. <BR/><BR/>See, here is Key with his merry bunch in the process of increasing the burden of socialism upon ordinary people ever more. And this carbon muck isn't the only increase they've been responsible for either.<BR/><BR/>Looking more and more like any fool who voted National wasted their vote. <BR/><BR/>LGMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-45952742045739216622009-03-03T14:26:00.000+13:002009-03-03T14:26:00.000+13:00"parliamentary climate change inquiry"I missed tha..."parliamentary climate change inquiry"<BR/><BR/>I missed that piece of news. It is obvious National doesn't care either way about this issue. Their only interest is:<BR/><BR/>"How can we tax people for this"<BR/><BR/>Especially in this economic climate with Big government spending it is not hard to see how they plan to top up the coffers.<BR/><BR/>No need for an inquiry. Key made it clear in Australia yesterday. The inquiry is a waste of time. Time for naive Rodney to make a little bit more noise.Dintherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09444894238003853527noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-32117336639213130352009-03-03T13:50:00.000+13:002009-03-03T13:50:00.000+13:00PC said...One of the five contributors compares co...PC said...<BR/><I>One of the five contributors compares computer climate modelling to ancient astrology.</I><BR/><BR/>I completely agree with that. Climate modeling is based on mathematics and scientists believe that the solutions to their model must be related one on one to physical reality, which is not necessary true. Sometimes the solutions give rise to unphysical phenomena (non-causal or violation of causality) , but scientists just go ahead with those unphysicalities as somehow, that they're fact of reality and are unobservable, but technology will catch up one day to prove that they really do exist.<BR/><BR/>One just have to wonder about the proliferation of researches that are being conducted on time-traveling, wormholes, exotic masses (negative mass) and so forth. Mathematically, time traveling and space-warping (wormhole) exists, but philosophically they do have contradictions and also violations of existence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com