tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post112070611819816481..comments2024-03-22T11:55:50.335+13:00Comments on Not PC: Peron's problems are of his own makingPeter Cresswellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1136220716623603642006-01-03T05:51:00.000+13:002006-01-03T05:51:00.000+13:00Enjoyed reading your posts.Enjoyed reading your posts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1121229084984726392005-07-13T16:31:00.000+12:002005-07-13T16:31:00.000+12:00Well there you go. In any case, it's not 'over twe...Well there you go. In any case, it's not 'over twenty years ago' that he was peddling this revolting stuff, as Peron and his one remaining fan have been spinning since his exposure as a total creep.Peter Cresswellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10699845031503699181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1121226060858223882005-07-13T15:41:00.000+12:002005-07-13T15:41:00.000+12:00James is partially correctThe earliest copy we hav...James is partially correct<BR/><BR/>The earliest copy we have of Unbound is 1987 just after the police raid. It is not the first issue, and the dates suggests it appears to have began publication around in 86 and continued untill 89. <BR/><BR/>Ironically James response shows that the comments he has made elsewhere are false, it has been claimed that NAMBLA did not stay in the store until Peron left but that he kicked them out and they promptly moved to the Public Library. The problem is that the library records show that NAMBLA applied to meet in the Library in late 89. If Peron moved in this store then this shows they stayed till he left. Contradicting James and Peron’s claims. <BR/><BR/>Interestingly enough, NAMBLA’s own comments confirm this they claim they stayed till the store was sold. Latter when asked by another person about this they said they would no longer comment on the issue until they had asked Jim Peron what he wanted them to say. A little while latter James and Peron claimed that NAMBLA had been mistaken and they now claimed they moved to the library before Peron left. However seeing Peron left in 89, as and they moved to the Library in late 89. James and Peron have again been shown to contradict the official records. <BR/><BR/>Sloppy James.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1121077890752185512005-07-11T22:31:00.000+12:002005-07-11T22:31:00.000+12:00Considering Peron moved to South Africa in 1989 ho...Considering Peron moved to South Africa in 1989 how could he have been printing Unbound in the ninetys...??? Sloppy PCAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1120729194675665542005-07-07T21:39:00.000+12:002005-07-07T21:39:00.000+12:00PC - With all due respect, it does matter " what P...PC - <BR/><BR/>With all due respect, it does matter " what Peters accused him of" - and how. Because Mr. Peters has a long history of making allegation under parliamentary privilege (or what I prefer to call the 'liar's licence') that, well, never quite seem to pan out. But why should he give a shit - there's zero accountability or come back is there?Craig Ranapiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08923246310584658857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1120714448756468862005-07-07T17:34:00.000+12:002005-07-07T17:34:00.000+12:00In this country, every-one deserves a fair trial.I...In this country, every-one deserves a fair trial.<BR/><BR/>If the judge thinks it is reasonable for the guy who punched Capill to get 2 years, then what punishment for a couple of low blows to the government officials wielding power like it is their God given right to make life difficult for people not officially charged with a crime. <BR/><BR/>I thought Libertarians were aware of the potential for corruption with that type of abuse of power?<BR/><BR/>I read the "evidence" and noted that some of the "facts" are disputable, and certainly could be interpreted in varying degrees of importance.<BR/><BR/>Jim Peron's "case" has been entirely handled in the press and parliament, starting with far more serious allegations that poisoned the minds of many from the very start.<BR/><BR/>I reserve judgement on Jim Peron at this point in time, mainly due to some unanswered questions, but it is clear to me the government has been heavy handed. <BR/><BR/>Issuing a limited visa so that he could argue his case, and if necessary pack his bags, would have been reasonable as I do not think his presence in the country constituted a danger to anyone.<BR/><BR/>Given he was presumed guilty and publicly executed of far worse crimes by Winston (and parliamentary privilege misused), it would have been a small token of balance.ZenTigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07888629207437612884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11906042.post-1120709856195551202005-07-07T16:17:00.000+12:002005-07-07T16:17:00.000+12:00I think you are a bit too close to it to be entire...I think you are a bit too close to it to be entirely objective though, IMHO. You people got the vapours because he lied to you and it went from there.There are worse people in this country - Capill for one. Anyway stop pissing me off- remember what happened to Acidman's house ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com