. . . promoting capitalist acts between consenting adults.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Quote of the day: Christopher Hitchens, (13 April 1949 – 15 December 2011)
"My own opinion is enough for me, and I claim the right to have it defended against any consensus, any majority, anywhere, any place, any time. And anyone who disagrees with this can pick a number, get in line and kiss my ass.” - Christopher Hitchens, Free Speech Debate at University of Toronto, 2006
Those cunning secularists, perverting the “reason for the season”! We hear the same complaints every year, from Fox News to the Vatican, that "Christ is being taken out of Christmas," about the "War against Christmas" (TM) -- about the "widespread revolt" against "Christian values” and “Christian symbols” –about the prevalence of "Happy Holidays" rather than "Merry Christmas" greetings…
Here's what I say to those complainers: Get a life. Learn some history. And try a Christmas joke:
Q: "What's the difference between God and Santa Claus?" A: "There is no God."
Ha ha ha. The harsh fact is, customers, Christ was never even in Christmas --except in fiction and by order of the first Popes.
None of the four gospels gives any notion of what time of year (let alone in what year) the supposed Nativity occurred. Only two gospels mention the virginity of Mary and only one has any mention of a "manger" [i.e., a trough]. Nowhere is there any record of a "stable." Wise men and shepherds are likewise very unevenly distributed throughout the discrepant accounts. So that the placement of a creche surrounded by a motley crew of humans and animals has no more Scriptural warrant than does The Life of Brian. Moreover, the erection of this exhibit near the turn of the year is actually a placation of the old Norse gods of the winter solstice - or "Yule" as the pre-Christians sometimes called it. I myself [says Christopher Hitchens] repose no faith in any man-made text or made-man redeemer, so when it's Christmas I say "Merry Christmas" with a clear conscience, as I respect Ramadan and Passover, and also because "Happy Holidays" is so thin and insipid. I don't mind if Christians honor the moment by displaying, and singing about, reindeer (a hard species to find in the greater Jerusalem/Bethlehem area). Same for the pine and fir trees that also don't grow in Palestine. I wish everybody joy of it.
And so do I. I just wish the Christians would leave off bashing us over the head with their myth—and their values.
Jesus wasn't even born in December, let alone at Christmas time: he was born in July* -- which makes him a cancer**. Just like religion.
Historians themselves know the "reason for the season," and it's not because of anything that happened away in a stable at a time of a non-existent census. Even the Archbishop of Canterbury knows the truth, conceding a couple of Christmasses ago that the Christmas story and the Three Wise Men - the whole Nativity thing itself -- is all just "a legend."
And I like myths and legends. I’m even happier when we remember they’re stories, not historical accounts.
Fact is, 'Christmas' itself was originally not even a Christian festival at all. The celebration we now all enjoy was originally the lusty pagan festival to celebrate the winter solstice, the festival that eventually became the Roman Saturnalia (right). This time of year in the northern hemisphere (from whence these traditions started) is when days stopped getting darker and darker, and started once again to lengthen. This was a time of the year for optimism. The end of the hardest part of the year was in sight (particularly important up in Lapland, the pagan home of the Norsemen where all-day darkness was the winter rule), and food stocks would soon be replenished.
All this was something worth celebrating with enthusiasm, with gusto and with plenty of food and drink and pleasures of the flesh -- and if those Norse sagas tell us anything, they tell us those pagans knew a thing or two about that sort of celebration! They celebrated a truly Salacious Saturnalia.
One popular celebration involved having a chap put on the horns and skin of the dead animal being roasted in the fire (worn with the fur side inside and the blood-red side outside ), and giving out gifts of food to revellers. This guy represented Satan, and the revellers celebrated beating him back for another year by making him a figure of fun (I swear, I'm not making this up). Observant readers will spot that the gift-giving and the fur-lined red outfit (and even the name, almost) are still with us in the form of Santa. So Happy Satanmas, Santa!
SUCH WERE THE celebrations of the past. But the Dark Age Christian do-gooders didn’t like the pagan revels. Instead of bacchanalia, these ghouls of the graveyard wanted instead to talk about suffering and their sores, and to spread the misery of their religion worldwide; instead of throwing themselves into such lewd and lusty revels, they thought everyone should be sitting at home mortifying their flesh – and very soon they hit upon a solution: first they stole the festivals, and then they sanitised them. Instead of lusty revels with Satan and mistletoe, we got insipid nonsense around a manger along with Magi, stars and shepherds dreamed up almost out of whole cloth. (Just think, the first 'Grinch' who stole Christmas was really a Pope!)
So given this actual history, it's somewhat churlish of today's sanitised saints of sobriety to be complaining now about history reasserting itself and folk claiming Christmas back for their revels.
“The secular meaning of the Christmas holiday is wider than the tenets of any particular religion: it is good will toward men—a frame of mind which is not the exclusive property (though it is supposed to be part, but is a largely unobserved part) of the Christian religion. The charming aspect of Christmas is the fact that it expresses good will in a cheerful, happy, benevolent, non-sacrificial way. One says: ‘Merry Christmas’—not ‘Weep and Repent.’ And the good will is expressed in a material, earthly form—by giving presents to one’s friends, or by sending them cards in token of remembrance.... “The best aspect of Christmas is the aspect usually decried by the mystics: the fact that Christmas has been commercialized. The gift-buying is good for business and good for the country’s economy; but, more importantly in this context, it stimulates an enormous outpouring of ingenuity in the creation of products devoted to a single purpose: to give men pleasure. And the street decoration put up by department stores and other institutions—the Christmas trees, the winking lights, the glittering colors—provide the city with a spectacular display, which only ‘commercial greed’ could afford to give us. One would have to be terribly depressed to resist the wonderful gaiety of that spectacle.
And so say all of us. I wish you all, wherever you are a Cool Yule, a Salacious Saturnalia, and a very Happy Christmas.
And while I’ll be posting occasionally between now and next year, I’ll see you back here again to give it the full press in the New Year.
Be as good as you can be while I’m gone.***
PS: Here’s some related Hot Facts from the Hot Facts Girl. Concentrate as well as you can…
I’ve just been to a wonderful show by two hugely talented artists at the start of their careers, artists the like of which you thought you’d never see again.
The “show was a presentation for Angela Mackie’s ‘Art History Cathedral Lectures’ – a whole enormously valuable experience on their own. So rather than listen to me, Here’s what Angela had to say about these two talented souls:
Classical Realism – Thursday 15 December 2011 Two European artists who trained (and met!) in Florence, became engaged in Paris, and married in Auckland – Jesper Sundwall and Jasmine Kamante – are our guest artists and speakers at our last lecture of the year on Classical Realism. They will be talking to you about their rich experiences training in the Classical Tradition in modern day Europe, and the journey that led them there. In addition, a selection of their drawings and paintings will be exhibited for sale at the lecture.
Jasmine Kamante, of Persian extraction, has had a passion for drawing portraits from a very young age. She began her art studies in New Zealand with a Bachelor of Visual Arts, specialising in glass and clay sculpture. Jasmine then spent three intensive years studying classical drawing and painting techniques in ateliers in Florence and Paris. Now a classically trained artist, she specialises in figurative narratives. Jasmine currently works full time in her studio in New Zealand. Jasmine's extensive studies of the human figure and, indeed, her own delightful personality and enquiring mind give her an empathy for her subjects which translates into accurate and honest representation of their facial expressions and body language. Her eclectic training has enabled her to blend a variety of techniques to produce exquisite work which has a sense of volume and movement. Jesper Sundwall (above) is an artist from Stockholm, Sweden. He studied at Parsons School of Design in Paris and New York, graduating with a Bachelor of Fine Arts with Honours in 1997. He designed for New York clients such as Rolling Stone Magazine, Sony and Korg for six years. During this time Jesper also studied at New York Art Academy. He then went on to pursue his passion for art and hone his painting and drawing skills by studying at an atelier in Florence. He now paints full time in his studio in New Zealand. Jesper's body of work showcases carefully considered, representational still lifes and figures. His works display a sensitivity that animates even the most inorganic of subjects. With expertly placed brush strokes, he manages to capture the varying tactile qualities of different materials and textures so well that you want to reach out and touch the subject.
The secular meaning of the Christmas holiday is wider than the tenets of any particular religion: it is good will toward men... “The charming aspect of Christmas is the fact that it expresses good will in a cheerful, happy, benevolent, non-sacrificial way. One says: ‘Merry Christmas’—not ‘Weep and Repent.’ And the good will is expressed in a material, earthly form—by giving presents to one’s friends, or by sending them cards in token of remembrance… “The best aspect of Christmas is the aspect usually decried by the mystics: the fact that Christmas has been commercialized. The gift-buying . . . stimulates an enormous outpouring of ingenuity in the creation of products devoted to a single purpose: to give men pleasure. And the street decorations put up by department stores and other institutions—the Christmas trees, the winking lights, the glittering colors—provide the city with a spectacular display, which only ‘commercial greed’ could afford to give us. One would have to be terribly depressed to resist the wonderful gaiety of that spectacle.” - Ayn Rand
My favourite Christmas song, performed by my favourite…oh, shite, why don’t I just let you hear it.
This is great. Shane McGowan’s great Fairytale Of New York, sung by Christy Moore with all the poignancy and accuracy it demands—none of which will be exhibited when I and my crapulous friends sing it later tonight.
I’ve just been told that over the Xmas break Stratos will be screening the Best of Perigo!, 6 favourite episodes of the Perigo! show re-screened, starting with Lindsay’s interview with the dear, departed Roger Kerr this Thursday at 8.00pm on Stratos, Sky 89, and ending with his Ayn Rand Special—about which he said, “This is it for me … I couldn’t be prouder.”
These are the shows, in the order they’ll go out:
1 - Roger Kerr 2 - Muriel Newman 3 - Don Brash 2 4 - The Mad Butcher 5 - Deborah Coddington 6 - The Ayn Rand Special
Why inevitable? Because the huge need for capital and the dire dearth of it available. Capital needs are almost EUR300 billion. Short of the central bank printing money (with everything that implies) no-one is gong to risk their own capital on this rapidly opening black hole. Says Bass: “There is no saviour large enough with a magic potion of capital to stave off this unfortunate conclusion to the global debt super cycle."
Time for banks, investors and pontificators to start treating “sovereign loans,” i.e., government debt, as the risky asset class it really is, says GMO.
Here’s Bass, who made a fortune predicting previous crashes:
"All I want for Christmas," says guest columnist Bernard Darnton, "is Christmas"
I wasn't one of those who bought a house near the top of the market with a hundred-percent mortgage and then extended the loan six months later to buy a bloody great big shiny new TV, so the recession (if not the Christchurch earthquake) has so far passed me by.
The worst effect of both is that austerity is still fashionable, even amongst those who aren't feeling the pinch. I had hope it would be a passing fad I could easily ignore, much as I ignore most passing fads. Not having a bloody great big shiny new TV I don't usually find out what the passing fads are until they've passed by, reached their destination, gone to the pub, and are having a lonely drink to drown their sorrows having been deserted by their followers.
Regarding the TV thing, I should add that I don't have anything against shiny expensive gadgets – Note to Santa: I quite like shiny expensive gadgets – it's just that I don't want a top notch telly when the programmes are so crap. Shite in high-definition is still shite.
The worst aspect of austerity-as-fashion-accessory is that it has invaded that stronghold of glorious consumption, Christmas. I know there are supposed to be religious reasons for Christmas – Jesus or Sol Invictus or something – but as far as I'm aware no verse in the Bible mentions the real highlight of Christmas, a fat bloke dressed as a Coke can.
This year once again our family has decided to cut back. That is, one person in our family has decided to cut back and told everyone else to comply. I certainly wasn't part of this daft decision, being merely a hanger-on by marriage. (And I only find out about this stuff after the fact. Mrs Darnton does all the present buying and associated carry-on at our place.) I don't think any of us is in financial trouble. I suspect the dig-for-England mentality is just a bit of vaguely Puritan middle-class guilt. A bit like when your mother told you to eat your dinner because people were starving in Ethiopia. Which makes as much sense as putting your coat on because it's cold at the North Pole.
We are now subject to strict present buying rules, which have been laid down by the central authority. Each participant is to buy one present, addressed to a designated recipient, up to a legislated maximum value. Excruciating Christmas morning horrors await.
The primary failure of the centrally-planned Christmas is that not everyone knows the plan. The Christmas Control Authority has been too polite to tell some people that the trimmings have been trimmed. Those without inside knowledge of how the systems works will arrive arms laden and expecting full festivities. Their generosity will be cruelly punished.
The Christmas Control Authority has also become the clearing house for problematic gift-buying decisions. Those who've been assigned a difficult relative or someone they don't know well seem to believe that a bureaucracy clever enough to make up all these rules also knows exactly what everyone wants. No. Expect resources to be misapplied to the novelty sock and amusing coffee mug industries. I'm almost praying for scorched almonds.
On the upside, the atheists are going to have a good time regardless. While the churchgoers are going to church (if they can find one here in Christchurch their God didn’t turn to rubble) the atheists will get in a two- or three-bottle head start to make the proceedings bearable, perhaps even entertaining. Without an explicit liquor ban, this will be the festive outlet of choice.
The question for next year is: will the failed experiment result in a return to laissez-faire or yet another round of regulation to correct the problems caused by the first lot. I wish you a raucous and regulation-free Christmas and hope that Santa hasn't been turned back from your place for the crime of overloading his sleigh.
When the sweet poison of the Treacherous Grape Had acted on the world a general rape; … Coffee arrives, that grave and wholesome Liquor That heals the stomach and makes the genius quicker.
Coffee was the Great Redeemer!
The massive, heavy body types of seventeenth-century paintings had their physiological explanation in high beer and beer-soup consumption… The insertion of coffee achieved chemically what the Protestants sought to fulfil spiritually [by] ‘drying’ up the beer-soaked bums and replacing them with ‘rationalistic, forward-looking bodies’ typical of the lean cynics of the nineteenth-century.
So British PM David Cameron is getting it in the neck for saying F.U. to the E.U. But what’s new? I bring you a few excerpts from Yes Minister 30 years ago which, if they had been taken seriously, may have helped avoid the entire situation.
(Note to younger readers and Americans: Yes, Minister was a clever Brit-com in the 1980s. PM Margaret Thatcher reportedly never missed it in that it was so close to the bone. Jim Hacker, a wet, naive plodder, was a senior MP, with the odious Sir Humphrey his personal secretary, i.e., a civil servant and thus, the real political power base. It later morphed into Yes, Prime Minister when Jim became the PM which saw Sir Humphrey holding the national reins. Humphrey was fantastically vile. The EEC was the forerunner of the EU.)
Sir Humphrey: Yes, and current policy. We had to break the whole thing [the EEC] up, so we had to get inside. We tried to break it up from the outside, but that wouldn't work. Now that we're inside we can make a complete pig's breakfast of the whole thing: set the Germans against the French, the French against the Italians, the Italians against the Dutch. The Foreign Office is terribly pleased; it's just like old times.
Hacker: But surely we're all committed to the European ideal?
Sir Humphrey: [chuckles] Really, Minister.
Hacker: If not, why are we pushing for an increase in the membership?
Sir Humphrey: Well, for the same reason. It's just like the United Nations, in fact; the more members it has, the more arguments it can stir up, the more futile and impotent it becomes.
Hacker: What appalling cynicism.
Sir Humphrey: Yes... We call it diplomacy, Minister.
Episode Five: The Devil You Know
Hacker: Europe is a community of nations, dedicated towards one goal.
Sir Humphrey: Oh, ha ha ha.
Hacker: May we share the joke, Humphrey?
Sir Humphrey: Oh Minister, let's look at this objectively. It is a game played for national interests, and always was. Why do you suppose we went into it?
Hacker: To strengthen the brotherhood of free Western nations.
Sir Humphrey: Oh really. We went in to screw the French by splitting them off from the Germans.
Hacker: So why did the French go into it, then?
Sir Humphrey: Well, to protect their inefficient farmers from commercial competition.
Hacker: That certainly doesn't apply to the Germans.
Sir Humphrey: No, no. They went in to cleanse themselves of genocide and apply for readmission to the human race.
Hacker: I never heard such appalling cynicism! At least the small nations didn't go into it for selfish reasons.
Sir Humphrey: Oh really? Luxembourg is in it for the perks; the capital of the EEC, all that foreign money pouring in.
This conference was the last chance to resuscitate the Kyoto agreement before it expires next year. Which means Kyoto is now dead.
And in a decade, Kyoto will be dead, buried, and have a large granite headstone over it.
What a shame.
The biggest news to emerge from the conference was the inclusion of developing countries like China and India in agreements. But what did they agree to? They agreed to meet again later. To take part in more talks to produce another agreement to met again, where they will no doubt agree to meet and talk again.
Because neither the Chinese nor the Indian politicians want to voluntarily put the heads of their own producers in a noose. They will leave that sort of stupidity to the idiots of the west.
Don't pretend we know what causes climate change – John Robson, T O R O N T O S U N Not only is the Kyoto Protocol technically flawed, the so-called science behind it is utter twaddle. Never mind complicated things like non-linear mathematics or, indeed, mathematics of any sort. The alarmists can't possibly know how to predict the future of Earth's climate because they can't explain its past… Ask the warmers with their spuriously precise predictions of a "greenhouse effect" involving floods, famines, hurricanes a'blowin and a bad moon rising: Can you plug in known year 1000 data and have your computer model produce a Medieval War Period ? If not, why should anyone believe you can plug in year 2000 data and predict 2215 or 2875? It's not just the Middle Ages.… [Even so] should we encounter sudden temperature change, the best defence would be wealth: productive resources able to replace failed agricultural systems, energy to heat or cool ourselves to survive new climatic patterns, new irrigation or drainage systems. The worst defence would be to inflict massive harm on our economies in pursuit of environmental phantoms. It's not just that Kyoto couldn't stop man-made global warming if it were happening. It's that the whole process is driven by fake science. If they can't explain the past they can't predict the future. And if they won't discuss the past, you know they can't explain it.
Long Faces in Durban– Jack Kelly, R E A L C L E A R P O L I T I C S Unseasonable cold greeted delegates to the U.N. conference on climate change in Durban,South Africa, Nov. 28. They were chilled more by the impending collapse of one of the most brazen scams in the history of the world. The warnings of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that the world faced doom from anthropogenic (man-made) global warming were based on peer-reviewed scientific literature, the IPCC chairman claimed. But when Canadian writer Donna LaFramboise checked the 18,531 references in the 2007 report, she found 5,587 were newspaper and magazine articles written by non-experts, unpublished theses and pamphlets produced by environmental groups. IPCC reports supposedly were written by leading scientists. Ms. LaFromboise found many authors were graduate students selected more for political connections and "diversity" than for expertise. This explains, in part, why these reports contain so many factual errors. Fraud is a better explanation…. In a review of Ms. Lafromboise's book … Judith Curry, chair of the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, said she "feels duped" by the IPCC, which she supported until December 2009. That month someone posted on the Internet 1,000 emails in which prominent scientists discussed how to hide a decline in global temperatures, evade Freedom of Information Act requests and smear scientists who disagreed with them. The U.N. climate change conference a couple of weeks later then flopped, in part because of the flap those emails caused. Just in time for the Durban conference, 5,000 more emails have been leaked. In this batch, scientists admit the science supporting anthropogenic global warming is weak and depends on data manipulation.
India Proudly Sinks the Durban Climate Change Talks – R E A S O N M A G A Z I N E America no longer is the only villain in the climate change melodrama. Canada this week formally withdrew from the Kyoto Treaty in order to avoid being slapped with $14 billion in fines next years for failing to deliver on its promised cuts. Canada’s environmental minister Peter Kent maintains that Canada would have to resort to extreme measures, like pulling all motor vehicles from its roads and shutting heat off to every building in the country in order to meet its targets. (He blamed the Liberal Party for agreeing to the treaty “without any regard as to how it would be fulfilled.”) This may or may not be hogwash, but with most of the major “polluters”—America, Canada, India and China—ducking and dodging, I think it is safe to start singing a requiem to a global climate change treaty. [Emphasis mine]
The Great Global Warming Fizzle – Bret Stephens, W A L L S T R E E T J O U R N A L The climate religion fades in spasms of anger and twitches of boredom. How do religions die? Generally they don't, which probably explains why there's so little literature on the subject… Consider the case of global warming, another system of doomsaying prophecy and faith in things unseen. As with religion, it is presided over by a caste of spectacularly unattractive people pretending to an obscure form of knowledge that promises to make the seas retreat and the winds abate. As with religion, it comes with an elaborate list of virtues, vices and indulgences. As with religion, its claims are often non-falsifiable, hence the convenience of the term "climate change" when thermometers don't oblige the expected trend lines. As with religion, it is harsh toward skeptics, heretics and other "deniers." And as with religion, it is susceptible to the earthly temptations of money, power, politics, arrogance and deceit. This week, the conclave of global warming's cardinals are meeting in Durban, South Africa, for their 17th conference in as many years… Yet a funny thing happened on the way to the climate apocalypse. Namely, the financial apocalypse. The U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada and the EU have all but confirmed they won't be signing on to a new Kyoto. The Chinese and Indians won't make a move unless the West does… Cap and trade is a dead letter in the U.S. Even Europe is having second thoughts about carbon-reduction targets that are decimating the continent's heavy industries and cost an estimated $67 billion a year. "Green" technologies have all proved expensive, environmentally hazardous and wildly unpopular duds. All this has been enough to put the Durban political agenda on hold for the time being. But religions don't die, and often thrive, when put to the political sidelines. A religion, when not physically extinguished, only dies when it loses faith in itself. That's where the Climategate emails come in… The reason they mattered is that they introduced a note of caution into an enterprise whose motivating appeal resided in its increasingly frantic forecasts of catastrophe. Papers were withdrawn; source material re-examined. The Himalayan glaciers, it turned out, weren't going to melt in 30 years. Nobody can say for sure how high the seas are likely to rise—if much at all. Greenland isn't turning green. Florida isn't going anywhere… Any belief system, particularly ones as young as global warming, cannot easily survive more than a few ounces of self-doubt.
Durban Climate Change Outcome Rubbished – Dr Richard McGrath, L I B E R T A R I A N Z Libertarianz leader Richard McGrath today labelled freshly-demoted cabinet ministers Nick Smith and Tim Groser as "useful idiots in the farce that was recently played out in Durban, South Africa." "As is the norm for these Climate Change junkets, there was plenty of hot air, and - thankfully this time - little in the way of commitment to further crippling industry and productivity.” "The Libertarianz Party believes individual New Zealanders should be left free to respond to any perceived human influence on global temperature in their own way. They don't need failed politicians such as Smith and Groser to tell them what to do, to punish their attempts to better their lives, and to regurgitate the junk science of charlatans such as Jim Salinger and Phil Jones… "The Libertarianz Party calls for an end to the idiocy of the ETS, which unfairly and senselessly penalises New Zealand farmers and industry for no gain."
Amongst all the commentary about yesterday’s cabinet reshuffle littering cyberspace, there is one worth reading. At Imperator Fish. It begins thus:
The King of the Gods, Zeus, yesterday announced a reshuffle of his pantheon, in an effort to freshen up his front bench. Getting the pantheon line-up right was always going to be one of the trickier tasks facing the Father of Gods and Men, and he will have had to manage some bruised egos during the process. One of the biggest beneficiaries is Hades, King of the Underworld. The Ruler of the Dead has been a strong performer over the last term and has been rewarded with an elevation to number four in the pecking order. Hades keeps the pits of Tartarus, but also assumes responsibility for economic development, science and innovation, tertiary education and associate finance.
Once upon a time there was a boy called John Banks.
When he was a very, very young boy he was in a gang with ‘Piggy’ Muldoon. He was one of Piggy’s favourites. Sometimes when Piggy would smile at him and pat him on the head. Those were the nights that John enjoyed most.
He thought back to them when he became mayor of a very small council called Auckland City.
He was mayor of a very small council, but he wasn’t content.
He wasn’t content because John didn’t want to be mayor of a very small council. A man who was one of Piggy’s favourites deserved better, he thought. And because he didn’t want to be mayor of a very small council, he borrowed a lot to make himself look bigger. It worked for Piggy, he thought. Well, for a while, anyway.
So, like Piggy, he borrowed an awful lot. He borrowed nearly one billion dollars, more than any mayor had ever borrowed before! And boy, did he and his small council have fun spending it. He felt really big, and really, really important. And people liked him, or seemed to.
Things were good.
For a while, anyway.
But John still wanted to be mayor of a big council. Of a really big council.
So when his friend Rodney amalgamated all the small Auckland councils into one big one, John knew what to do.
Unfortunately, his arch-enemy Len knew how to do it better.
So when Len did him out of the job Rodney had made for him, the job running the big council, John was really jealous. And he was especially jealous when Len said his big council was going to borrow 3.2 billion dollars, a quarter of that just to cover Johns’ debts. And he was green with envy when Len promised to crank up the debt to six billion dollars in five years time.
John was jealous, but he said nothing. He said nothing, because John had a new job. Another job. A job wearing yellow, drinking cups of tea in public, and telling people who run things they should borrow a lot less.
And no-one else wearing yellow seemed to notice what John had learned from Piggy. Or that he dribbled occasionally whenever someone mentioned Len. Or Len’s borrowing.
Not everyone will be comfortable with the proposals in the paper, but the Law Commission has, I think, admirably fulfilled its brief of providing a basis for discussion. And, finally, the role of a free and robust press in a democracy is strongly and repeatedly emphasised in this discussion paper. Given that the minister who commissioned this review did not think to say so, I am particularly glad the Commission has.
What’s going on in Europe economically is impossible to understand without getting your head around what’s happening in Europe politically.
And it’s virtually impossible to understand what’s happening in Europe politically without having some idea of the on-going European political project: the European Union, or EU.
Because while the European Union had its beginnings in the benevolent notion that free trade would give Europe the peace it has so rarely enjoyed historically—the idea best summed up by the great Frederic Bastiat as “if goods don’t cross borders then armies will”—it has in more recent decades been more interested in regulation than in trade, and more in political union than in economic prosperity.
This is one reason that everything in Europe looks upside down economically—overspending “cured” by more spending; over-borrowing “cured” by more borrowing; debt “fixed” by the creation of more debt, and IOUs “written off” by the creation of more IOUs.
Where other countries kick cans down the road, the European Union kicks whole kegs. And this is a keg that won’t take much to explode.
So the house the European Union has built is now incredibly fragile, both economically and politically. Which is why even the relatively tepid “No"!” flung in the face of Europhiles over the weekend by British Prime Minister David Cameron was enough to give them conniptions.
If you want to start understanding why, and to understand what’s been happening in Europe politically, might I suggest you start with Liberty Scott’s excellent primer on the subject, the first part of a series:
It’s spending a lot more than it takes in, at a time when it has a lot less.
It is spending a lot more at a time when it has a lot less because some alleged economists tell them this this is A Good Thing.
Because cutting costs is politically difficult when you just want to be liked.
And because cutting spending is logistically difficult when public sector unions resist every cut in spending, and go apoplectic when cuts in salaries are even contemplated. Even if a lack of cuts loses jobs.
It’s no different here in EnZed than anywhere else.
Quote of the day: Christopher Hitchens, (13 April 1949 – 15 December 2011)
From "Letters To A Young Contrarian"
"They proceed from conclusion to evidence; our greatest resource is the mind, and the mind is not well-trained by being taught to assume what has to be proved."
"They" are those who place their destinies in faith in invisible umpires.
Hitchens' death is truly saddening for he was a man of vision while maintaining a caustic perception of those who fail to ponder.
You can watch him say it here: http://www.vanityfair.com/video/2011/12/1329955421001
Have a Salacious Saturnalia!
You have called recently to like-minded people to form a party of freedom lovers to replace ACT/Libz/Conservative?
And what you do? Mocking Christianity? You better just to sit in your lonely corner and take pot shots at others who truly love to bring freedom to the population in a new Party.
As I said before PC, you don't fit any other party except the pathetic Libz. Don't bother to join any new movement since you're a poison.
@"Christian" Libz: Has anyone ever expained to you the concept of separating Church and State?
Or the etiquette of providing some sort of argument, even a threadbare one, to back up your complaints?
Then perhaps I could recommend both to you.
And merry christmas.
Separation of Church and State my friend doesn't mean keeping the Church out of the state it means keeping the State out of the Church.
As it is every Advent as part of the empty noise, which is the distinguishing feature of the season, we get people like you trying to convince themselves there is nothing in it.
Axial tilt is the Reason for the Season
@Andrei: You said "Separation of Church and State my friend doesn't mean keeping the Church out of the state."
Yes, you really said that.
Can I suggest someone point you to a definition of "separation"?
Quite soon, would be good.
Ah, the traditional Cresswell Christmas Rant. Thank you, Peter. Christmas just wouldn't be the same without an atheist pontificating about Christians usurping a holiday that no-one still celebrates while criticizing those same Christians for complaining about the secularization of Christmas. It's all so wonderfully circular.
Oh, BTW, Andrei is right. The separation of church and state was place in the US constitution to protect the church from the state. Apparently no-one at the time envisaged people crazy enough to image a government that ignored the moral teachings of the church or one that would think it could take the place of God.
It's his blog, he can say what he likes on it. If you don't like it, don't read it.
You're right, macdoctor.
I get all my moral guidance from an absent father, a bastard and some dude who impregnanted another bloke's fiance.
If things are so bad PC, you can take solace in the fact that the Christian based Conservative party scored 30x more votes than your irrelevant Libz
You may hate God but He loves you and He has a great sense of humour.......
And arguments about the timing of Xmas are pathetic. We celebrate Queens birthday on a date different from her actual birthday. And Christ existed, he was a real person, but was he the Son of God? There's the rub......
Have a very merry Christmas PC and season's greetings to all your readers :)
Hi PC, the majority of people in recorded history have had, and continue to have a belief in either religion, the supernatural or an afterlife.
What does Darwinism / Evolution say about this? It seems that the evolutionary process, through Natural Selection, has led to these widespread beliefs amongst various peoples of the earth.
I.e., it seems these beliefs are a natural consequence of the evolutionary process in humans.
Do you agrees with this? Or do you see it as a temporary state of affairs? Or what.
I wonder if religious belief is hard-wired in many people.
I think Jesus probably did exist as a great, caring and probably wise man. But the passage of time has probably led to distortions in what we now have as a 'Bible' due to various political influences over time..
I can't understand those who get worked up about these sorts of things on either side of the debate, arguably being an 'atheist' is becoming just as religious these days.
The Pope's "camauro" (camel skin hat) looks like a Santa Claus hat. It was often red and lined with white fur. It was part of the papal wardrobe from the 12th century until the 1960s for keeping the head warm in winter. St Nicholas (Santa Claus) was a Bishop and came to be associated with similar garb.
My beer fridge is fast filling with fine festive follies from far flung fields! Recently added was a rather large crayfish, which, still alive, will be standing guard - right up until xmas morning.
Rather more bowser than wowser.
Ha! You say the Bible doesn't state the time of year of the Nativity but it does. Jesus was born in March or April, proof of this is in the Bible.
If it wasn't spring the sheep would have been locked up in a barn overnight to prevent wolves, bears, and lions having mutton for dinner. Sheep were only kept in fields overnight during lambing season so newborn lambs wouldn't get squashed.
The Bible describes the shepherds as being in the fields at night - ergo, Jesus was born in lambing season.
Classical realism, in NZ
Is it possible to describe, briefly, or link, to difference between classical realism and romantic realism?
Great stuff. Wish I could have been there!
It is wonderful to see such life-affirming art being painted right here in New Zealand. Just shows that there are some very talented people who are there if you look for them. (Another is David Knowles from the lower North Island).
Do they intend exhibiting their work in the near future? Thanks for posting.
Julian (a different one from the commenter above)This comment has been removed by the author.
Thank you for your comments. Julian, we will definitely be exhibiting our work again next year. We have a few shows to organise, and possibly another lecture. If you would like to go onto our mailing lists, please email me via my website
Jesper's website is here if you would like to see more of his work: http://www.jespersundwall.com
Mark - I am going to ask Angela Mackie (who runs the Cathedral Lectures) to reply to you as she has a Doctorate in Art History and will be able to explain it much better than I can!
Great stuff guys - talent is such a wonderful thing to behold.
An atheist Christmas?
Sing Happy Christmas
This is also a nice christmas song too.
Happy Christmas PC, to you and your crapulous friends! Thanks for all the hours of distraction your blog has afforded me this year
Perigo! for Xmas
“Prepare for European default”
I am amazed you have no other comments here PC, where are they,
NOT PJ: What's the Reason for this Folly?
You could do a lot worse than scorched almonds.
And often do.
Those paying attention will notice that this a repost from last year. The good news is that if you're faced with this sort of horror there is a way to make sure it's never repeated, courtesy of Oxfam. Make sure that the person who made all the rules gets a charity non-present - the sort of thing where you buy a knob of goat shit for an African village and the ostensible recipient gets nothing. The rules are guaranteed to be relaxed next year and you can spend the tax deduction on those scorched almonds.
Much more importantly, what can you report about any changes to the rules for this year?
Quote of the day” Paper money is …
The art of war, by cartoon [updated]
Coffee fuelled the Age of Enlightenment
Notes on the Eurozone crisis
Yes Minister and Yes Prime MInister are still playing on the Sky comedy channel.
RIchard Prebble famously said "The public think its a comedy, the bureaucrats think its a documentary and the Cabinet Ministers know it is a tragedy".
Another great show from the eighties was Spitting Image, its a blast from the past to watch that on you tube.
Sayonara Kyoto [update 4: Sayonara climate activism]
And Canada has just invoked its legal right and pulled out of Kyoto. Are you listening Mr Key? Why are you hampering NZ business? Julian
The drought is over...
Lets be real...Aussie are in the pits and facing a massive rebuild...same as when we last beat them in 85. Until we can compete eye to eye with them at their peak we have achieved little.
There once was a boy called John Banks
Quote of the day: Your life belongs to … ?
I always thought it was
The left: Your life belongs to us. The right: Your life belongs to our imaginary gods. Ayn Rand: Your life belongs to you.
Watch out, there’s a (new) watchdog about [updated]
Yes, and have it noted that Whaleoil supports this regulation also. When it comes to intrusions into your life by the State, the right and left are little different.
Great, the same code as other media. "One noose, Peter, ...
What’s going on in Europe?
"--Imagine you've mortgaged your house to the hilt in order to fill it with all the gadgets your heart desires. And imagine you have a big heart, with lots of desires. Your home has a comfy lounge with a large new HD television in front of it. There's a plush recliner in which to park your weary behind. And all around the house are the accumulated creature comforts that enhance the quality of your domestic life.
--Now imagine you're forced to take a pay cut at work. Your job no longer provides you with enough income to support the interest payments on your mortgage. Your domestic bliss is still undisturbed. But in the back of your mind, you know that you're living way beyond your means. Your lifestyle exceeds your financial resources.
--Now imagine you're the European Union - a vast army of faceless bureaucrats desperately trying to save its big 60-year project in social engineering. The private market - investors who buy government bonds - tells you its losing confidence that you can control your spending. More importantly, the private market tells you it doesn't see how you're going to repay the debts you've already accumulated in order to support your lavish, government-sponsored, Welfare State lifestyle.
--What do you do to convince them you're a good bet? You tell them that the answer to your problem is bigger government. That's right! Your answer to a debt problem is to turn all the big national governments into one really big supra-national government, and give a few people control over everyone else's money.
--That's basically what happened in Europe since we last wrote to you. All 17 countries that use the Euro agreed to greater "fiscal integration". Even 10 or so countries not in the Euro agreed that it was a good idea. The lone exception was that island nation north of France, filled with cranky people drinking warm beer (their beer is warm...no wonder they're cranky). The British politely declined to pledge their allegiance to a European superstate."
PSA: Pen-pushing Socialism Addicts
If only Smile and wave would grow a pair and rip off that band aid, do it and move on to better things...
The best line is the last line:
"Fortunio's advice to leaders who want to shrink the state: 'Do what you need to do quickly, swiftly, like when you take of a band aid you know, just do it and move on to better things.'"