Funny enough, that I visited Open-Parachute blog, yesterday and I saw that quote, which is very true.
I often find it irritating debating with people who believe in faith-based practices, in which they revert to that escape clause of : we simply don't know, after I went to great length to say that there is no such thing because for the unknown to be discovered at some future point, it means that the existence as we know it, wouldn't exist (all laws of physics are being violated and break loose).
We welcome thoughtful disagreement. But we do (ir)regularly moderate comments -- and we *will* delete any with insulting or abusive language. Or if they're just inane. It’s okay to disagree, but pretend you’re having a drink in the living room with the person you’re disagreeing with. This includes me. PS: Have the honesty and courage to use your real name. That gives added weight to any opinion.
Funny enough, that I visited Open-Parachute blog, yesterday and I saw that quote, which is very true.
ReplyDeleteI often find it irritating debating with people who believe in faith-based practices, in which they revert to that escape clause of : we simply don't know, after I went to great length to say that there is no such thing because for the unknown to be discovered at some future point, it means that the existence as we know it, wouldn't exist (all laws of physics are being violated and break loose).
The statement is a tautalogy, which means that the statement itself is trivially true and hence contains no information.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, the statement identifies something true and important about knowledge.
ReplyDeleteIf that be tautalogy[sic], then make the most of it.